[00:00:03]
[ TOWN OF GREENBURGH ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD 177 Hillside Avenue, Greenburgh, NY 10607 CATHERINE LEDERER-PLASKETT Chair ]
IS THE FOUR, THE 15TH OF APRIL, 2025.THIS IS THE GREENBERG ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD.
EDDIE MAE BARNES IS NOT HERE TODAY.
CATHERINE LETTER OF PLAS HERE.
UM, WE INVITED THE APPLICANT STRESSING THAT IT IS THAT THEY SHOULD ATTEND.
THE APPLICANT DECIDED NOT TO ATTEND.
WE HAVE OPEN MEETINGS LAW, SO YOU HAVE TO LEAVE ALL THE DOORS OPEN.
WE DO HAVE TO TELL THEM IF THEY GET TOO LOUD TO SPEAK.
UM, WE INVITED THE APPLICANT TO ATTEND.
HE DECLINED TO ACCEPT OUR INVITATION.
SO WE ARE PROCEEDING ACCORDING TO THE CLOCK.
THIS APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED ON THE 10TH OF APRIL, 2025.
THIS MEETING IS ON THE 15TH OF APRIL.
THE APPLICANT IS AEROSMITH DEVELOPMENT.
THEY ARE SUBMITTING FOR TWO 80 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE, THE FORTUNE BUILDING, AND THEY ARE DOING SO ON BEHALF OF AT AND TE.
THE FIRST QUESTION ASKS FOR A ASKS FOR NAMES, ADDRESS, AND QUALIFICATION PLEASE.
DONNA, IF SOMETHING I SAY YOU THINK WE SHOULD CHANGE, PLEASE SAY SO.
BUT OTHERWISE I'LL MOVE AHEAD.
UM, NAME, ADDRESS AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONS PREPARING THE REPORT AND HIS OR HER OR THEIR SIGNATURES ATTESTING TO THE TRUTH AND COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN.
WE ONLY HAVE THE APPLICANT'S, UM, INFORMATION.
WE HAVE A, A COMPUTERIZED SIGNATURE, BUT WE DON'T HAVE, WE DON'T HAVE ANY OF THE PEOPLE WHO MADE UP THE REPORT.
THEY HAVE TO ATTEST TO THIS AND THEY HAVE TO INCLUDE THEIR QUALIFICATIONS AS DOES MR. UM, AS DOES THE SITE ACQUISITION SPECIALIST.
WE DON'T KNOW WHAT MAKES YOU A SITE ACQUISITION SPECIALIST.
BUT WE DON'T HAVE SIGNATURES, WE DON'T HAVE QUALIFICATIONS, AND WE DON'T HAVE NAMES OR ADDRESSES FOR ANY OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PUT THIS REPORT TOGETHER.
SO THEREFORE, THE, UM, A IS INCOMPLETE.
B, WE HAVE A, ITS NAMES, ADDRESSES, AND LANDLINE AND CELLULAR NUMBERS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, UM, OPERATOR AND APPLICANT.
THE PROPERTY OWNER'S, ASSOCIATES, THEY PROVIDE THE CELL AND SAY THERE'S NO LINE LANDLINE AVAILABLE.
OPERATOR AT AND T MOBILITY CORPORATION.
I THINK THAT'S THE FIRST TIME WE'RE EVER HEARING IT CALLED MOBILITY CORPORATION.
UM, AND THE PHONE NUMBER IS PROVIDED.
WE DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS A LANDLINE OR A CELL, WE NEED TO KNOW WHETHER IT'S A LANDLINE OR CELL.
UM, THEN WE HAVE THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED BOTH THE PHONE NUMBER.
AGAIN, WE DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT'S A CELL PHONE OR A LANDLINE, BUT WHAT, BUT, AND HE HAS PROVIDED ALSO HIS EMAIL ADDRESS EVEN THOUGH THAT WAS NOT REQUESTED.
HOWEVER, FOR SOME REASON, AND WE'VE NEVER HAD THIS IN SINCE 1996, WHERE THEY CHOSE ALSO TO ADD LEGAL COUNSEL, WHICH IS NOT REQUESTED.
SO THEY SHOULD REMOVE LEGAL COUNSEL AND CORRECT THIS WITH IDENTIFYING WHAT THE PHONE NUMBERS ARE.
UM, C POSTAL ADDRESS AND SHEET BLOCK AND LOT OF, UH, UH, OR PARSON.
NUMBER OF THE PROPERTY IS COMPLETE, GIS AND XY COORDINATES SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE WIRELESS FACILITY IS ALSO COMPLETE.
THE ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS SITUATED IS ALSO
[00:05:01]
COMPLETE.SO NOW WE'RE UP TO F UM, I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BY THE WAY THIS WAS ANSWERED.
THE QUESTION IS IF THE INSTALLATION IS PURSUANT TO A LEASE AGREEMENT CONFIRMATION FROM THE LESSOR THAT THE LEASE E IS AUTHORIZED TO UTILIZE THE PROPERTY INCLUDED.
AND THE ANSWER THAT IS WRITTEN HERE IS INCLUDED IN EXHIBIT A IS THE AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AUTHORIZING AEROSMITH DBA AEROSMITH DEVELOPMENT ON BEHALF OF AT AND T TO UTILIZE THE PROPERTY FOR AT T'S UPGRADES WITH SEVEN COPIES AS REQUESTED.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS SEVEN COPIES AS REQUESTED IS REFERRING TO.
THE APPLICATIONS HAVE A CERTAIN NUMBER REQUIRED, BUT IT'S NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS.
AND AS WELL AS THE COVER AND SIGNATURE PAGES OF THE LEASE BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNER AND AT AND T, THE AUTHORIZATION, WHICH IS THE FIRST THING I, UM, LISTED HERE, UM, AUTHORIZATION AEROSMITH, THE AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AUTHORIZING AEROSMITH ON BEHALF OF AT T TO UTILIZE THE PROPERTY FOR AT AND T UPGRADES IS TOTALLY ILL ILLEGIBLE.
AND WE NEED A COPY THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY READ.
THE PRINT IS, WE CAN'T MAKE OUT WHAT IT SAYS.
AND, UM, AS WELL AS THE COVER AND SIGNATURE PAGES OF THE LEASE BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNER AND AT AND T, IT SAYS IN THAT, THAT THE LEASE EXPIRED IN 2017.
WE NEED SOMETHING THAT SAYS THE LEASE IS VALID TODAY.
G IS A DESCRIPTION OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALL THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY EXCAVATION.
THIS DOES NOT, THE ANSWER DOES NOT PROVIDE US WITH THE INFORMATION OF WHETHER THINGS ARE GOING TO BE REMOVED, THINGS THAT ARE LATER ANSWERED IN DIFFERENT OTHER SECTIONS.
THIS IS NOT A FULL DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK.
I DIRECT THE APPLICANT TO GO TO PAST APPLICATIONS TO SEE WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR BECAUSE THIS SHOULD BE AN ITEMIZED DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IS BEING REMOVED, WHAT IS BEING ADDED, AND IF THE, AND IF THINGS ARE BEING REMOVED OR ADDED, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN IT.
MOVING ON TO PROVIDE A CER, UH, EIGHT OR H PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION ISSUED BY THE TOWN OF GREENBURG FOR THE SUPPORT STRUCTURE OF THE EXISTING ANTENNAS FOR OUR UTIL FOR UTILITY POLE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
PROVIDE THE, UM, POLE OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS AS WELL AS THE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR THE POLE.
IT ASKS FOR, IT ASKS IF YOU'RE GOING TO BE USED BY ANOTHER.
UM, USE HER J CERATE CERTIFICATION, THE, UM, SUPPORT.
CER CERTIFICATION OF THE SUPPORT STRUCTURE IS CAPABLE OF SAFETY, SAFELY HANDLING THE ADDITIONAL ANTENNAS EQUIPMENT TO BE ADDED AGAIN, INCLUDING AN EXHIBIT IN EXHIBIT E ARE EIGHT COPIES OF THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHY THIS IS IN THIS IF HE'S ONE, IT SAYS SEVEN NOW THIS SAYS EIGHT.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS APPLICANT IS REFERRING TO.
PREPARED BY AEROSMITH, WHICH SHOWS A PASSING STRUCTURE.
UM, PASSING STRUCTURE ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED ANTENNA AND EQUIPMENT UPGRADE BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL ANALYSIS, THE SUPPORT STRUCTURES CAPABLE OF SAFELY HANDLING THE PROPOSED ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT.
THE RECOMMENDATIONS SUBSECTION IS A STANDARD SUBSECTION AND STANDARD LANGUAGE OF A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.
IF THERE ARE ANY STRUCTURAL ISSUES, THE ISSUES WOULD BE HIGHLIGHTED WITHIN THIS SUBSECTION OF THE ANALYSIS.
SINCE THERE ARE NO STRUCTURAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT LOADING THE RECOMMENDATION, STATE THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY FOR THE EQUIPMENT AND NO MODIFICATIONS TO BE TO THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE EXISTING MONOPOLE ARE REQUIRED.
I WOULD LIKE THE APPLICANT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT, UM, THEIR ANALYSIS IS, I BELIEVE IS FROM 2021.
THE BUILDING IS PUTTING STEEL PLATES ON THE ROOF AND THIS ANALYSIS DOES NOT TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION AND THEREFORE IS NOT COMPLETE.
I'D LIKE TO READ INTO THE RECORD A LETTER FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO MARK AND SUN METAL PRODUCTS INC.
3 3 3 RAILROAD AVENUE, BEDFORD HILLS, NEW YORK, 1 0 5 0 7, DATED MARCH 20TH, 2025.
UM, REGARDING FORTUNE ASSOCIATES, LLC TWO 80 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE INSTALLATION OF STEEL DUNNAGE FRAMING TO RAISE EXISTING CELLULAR ANTENNA EYE AND EQUIPMENT OFF ROOF
[00:10:01]
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STEEL DUNNAGE FOR THE RELOCATION INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS WITH ASSOCIATED ASSOCIATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY EQUIPMENT.ALL STRUCTURAL WORK TO BE DONE PRE PRE PER APPROVED PLANS IF FIELD CONDITIONS VARY.
CON UM, IF FIELD CONDITIONS VARY, CONTACT DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK, SEPARATE PERMITS TO BE OBTAINED FOR ALL OTHER WORK.
THAT IS THE RE ON THIS LETTER.
THE LETTER IS, UM, ADDRESS DEAR MARK AND SUN METAL PRODUCTS INC.
I HAVE REVIEWED THE PLANS AND DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS.
THE TOWN OF GREENBURG BUILDING DEPARTMENT IS IN RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION TO RAISE AN EXISTING MULTIPLE PROVIDERS CELLULAR ANTENNA STRUCTURE THREE FEET ONTO A STEEL PLATFORM.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT ALL THREE PROVIDERS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THE ROOF HAVE SUBMITTED ANTENNA APPLICATIONS AND ARE DEEMED COMPLETE BY THE ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD.
THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN PLACED ON HOLD.
I REFER TO CHAPTER 2 85, UH, ZONING 2 85 DASH 37 AND HAVE ATTACHED THE APPLICATION FOR ANTENNA FOR YOUR USE AND INFORMATION.
THIS IS SIGNED BY, UM, THE, UH, PLANNING EXAMINER PLAN EXAMINER, UH, LIZ, I'M SORRY, LIZ GARRITY.
SHE IS OUR DEPUTY BUILDING INSPECTOR.
UM, THE, SO, AS I MENTIONED, THIS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS DOES NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE FACT THAT THERE ARE GOING TO BE STEEL PLATES PUT ON THE ROOF, THEREFORE, IT'S, IT INCOMPLETE.
IT DOESN'T PROVIDE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION.
KK IS THE MAKE MODEL AND MANUFACTURER OF THE ANTENNAS.
THE FREQUENCY L THE FREQUENCY MODULATION AND CLASS OF SERVICE OF RADIO EQUIPMENT IS COMPLETE.
THE NUMBER TYPE AND DESIGN OF ANTENNAS PROPOSED.
IT IS UNCLEAR FROM THIS AN, UM, ANSWER AND TAKEN IN CONSIDERATION WITH THE ANSWER PROVIDED FOR G.
IN TOTAL, HOW MANY ANTENNAS WILL BE ON THE ROOF? HOW MANY ARE THERE? NOW? WE HAVE NO IDEA FROM THOSE ANSWERS.
WE'VE NEVER HAD THIS BEFORE WHERE THE PERSON DOES NOT SECTION OUT THE ANSWERS BUT LUMPS THEM ALL TOGETHER BECAUSE NEAR LEVEL ONE IS AN ANSWER NEAR LEVEL TWO.
THIS IS N NEAR LEVEL TWO IS AN ANSWER.
NEAR LEVEL THREE IS AN ANSWER.
LOOKING AT WHAT WAS SUBMITTED.
UM, CERTIFICATION THAT NEAR LEVELS AT THE PROPOSED SITE INCLUDE THOSE, INCLUDING THOSE OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY EXISTING FACILITIES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION ARE WITHIN THRESHOLD LEVELS ADOPTED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.
AND THAT PROPOSED SITE WILL NOT PRODUCE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE PRODUCTION OF EMISSIONS LEVELS EXCEEDING THE THRESHOLD LISTED ON TABLE FOR OF ANY SUBSEQUENT SUPERSEDING OR ANY SUBSEQUENT SUPERSEDING EMISSION STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.
BASED ON THE MAXIMUM EQUIPMENT OUTPUT.
SUCH CERTIFICATION SHALL STATE THAT IT IS APPLICABLE TO THE APPLICANT'S AFFILIATE, UM, AFFILIATES, JOINT VENTURES, PARTNER PARTNERS, SUBSIDIARY SUCCESSORS AND INTEREST IN THE SIGNED.
THE SECOND PART OF THAT PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS AND DATA THAT INDICATES THE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM AMOUNT OF, UM, OR, OR LEVEL OF RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS THAT ARE PRODUCED BY THE EQUIPMENT, WHICH IT, WHEN IT IS AN OPERATION, UM, WHAT IT IS IN OPERATIONAL MODE, WE RE WE GET A TABLE THAT COMBINES ALL OF THE, SO THE RESPONSE SAYS, INCLUDED IN EXHIBIT C IS THE RADIO FREQUENCY EXPOSURE ANALYSIS PREPARED BY AEROSMITH THAT WA UM, 1 27 25 THAT WAS GENERATED FOR THIS SITE.
THE REPORT STATES OUR ANALYSIS WAS BASED IN ON THE GENERAL'S PUBLIC STANDARDS AND AT T'S CALCULATED PERCENTAGE OF THE THRESHOLD IS 1.954.
AS A, UM, AS A CONCLUSION, SITE GREENBERG IS CONSIDERED COMPLIANT WITH FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.
THE RULES SHOW THAT ALL CARRIERS PASSED EITHER EXPOSURE
[00:15:01]
ANALYSIS AT T WILL PROVIDE AN ANA AN ANNUAL STATEMENT TO THE TOWN VERIFICATION THAT RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS DO NOT EXCEED THE APPLICABLE FFCC REGULATIONS.THIS DOES NOT PROVIDE US WITH A CUMULATIVE AMOUNT THAT ALL THREE PROVIDERS HAVE.
I SUGGEST THAT THE PROVI THAT THE APPLICANT GO AND LOOK AT A BUILDING TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND REVIEW THE MANY, MANY PAST APPLICATIONS DEEMED COMPLETE AND LOOK AT WHAT AN ACTUAL ANALYSIS REPORT LOOKS LIKE AND WHAT IS INCLUDED IN IT.
THIS PROVIDES US WITH NONE OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED AS FAR AS THE MONITORING PLAN.
SO THIS, SO ONE AND TWO ARE INCOMPLETE.
THE THIRD COMPONENT OF THIS QUESTION SAYS A MONITORING PLAN FOR THE APPLICANT'S EQUIPMENT THAT WILL PROVIDE ANNUAL STATEMENTS TO THE TOWN, VERIFYING THAT THE RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS DO NOT EXCEED THE APPLICABLE FCC REGULATIONS.
THE ANSWER PROVIDED SAYS THE REPORT SHOWS, UH, WAIT, IT'S AT T WILL PROVIDE AN ANNUAL STATEMENT TO THE TOWN VERIFYING THE RADIO FREQUENCY ADMISSIONS DO NOT EXCEED THE APPLICANT APPLICABLE FCC REGULATIONS.
FIRST, THEY MUST SUBMIT THE FIRST PART AND THEN THE SECOND PART REQUIRES A DATE, ANNUAL DATE, UH, BY WHICH IF THEY DON'T, THE TOWN DOES NOT RECEIVE IT.
THEY ARE IN CO THEY ARE NO LONGER IN COMPLIANCE.
SO OTHERS PICK THE END OF JANUARY, OTHERS PICK THE END OF DECEMBER, THE APP, IT'S UP TO THE APPLICANT, BUT THEY MUST PROVIDE A DATE BY WHICH CERTIFIC, SO THAT IS INCOMPLETE OH CERTIFICATION THAT THE PROPOSED ANTENNAS WILL NOT CAUSE INTERFERENCE WITH THE EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE.
A MONITORING PLAN AND NON INTERFERENCE LETTER PREPARED BY AT AND T DATED 1 3 11 20 25 IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT C.
THE MONITORING PLAN CONFIRMS THAT AT T WILL RUN AN ANNUAL NEAR REPORT AND PROVIDE TO THE TOWN OF GREENBERG BUILDING DEPARTMENT ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD.
THE NON INTERFERENCE LETTER VIA THE EXISTING LEASE AGREEMENT CONFIRMS THE INSTALLATION, MAINTAINS AN OPERATION, AND I'M SORRY, CONFIRMS THAT THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF THEIR COMMUNICATION FACILITY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH EXISTING CELLULAR CARRIER RATE CARRIERS, RADIO, TELEVISION, TELEPHONE, AND LIKE APPLIANCES.
WHAT IS REQUIRED HERE, AND WE DON'T, SO IF I GO TO EXHIBIT C, LET'S GO TO EXHIBIT C TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY LANGUAGE IN THAT.
THIS IS WHERE IT'S VERY HELPFUL IF THE APPLICANT ABSOLUTELY, UH, SHOWS UP BECAUSE THEY COULD ALWAYS HELP FACILITATE, UH, IF IT IS SOMEWHERE ELSE, WHERE IS IT? AND OTHER APPLICANTS AT LEAST HAVE THEIR PAPERS SO THAT IT'S EASIER TO FACILIT, EASIER TO ACCESS.
SO WHAT WHAT THEY ARE DIRECTING US TO IS THE NON-INTERFERENCE LETTER VIA THE EXISTING LEASE.
SO I IT'S IN EXHIBIT C, IT'S A LETTER.
THE LETTER READS, TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN AN AT T MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE IT'S WIRELESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FCC REQUIREMENTS OR RADIO FREQUENCY EXPOSURE ANALYSIS REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE TOWN OF GREENBURG BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR THE, UM, ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD FOR MODIFICATION TO ABOVE REFERENCED, I'M LOOKING FOR THE SECTION ABOUT IN THE EVENT THAT'S, THIS IS NOT A MONITORING PLAN.
IT SAYS IF WE SEE THIS IS AN INTERESTING ISSUE BECAUSE THIS LETTER SAYS IN THE FUTURE, IN THE EVENT THE TOWN OF GREENBURG BUILDING DEPARTMENT ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD, REASONABLY BELIEVE A PHYSICAL MODIFICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED AT AND T FACILITY AFFECTING COMPLIANCE IN SUCH AGENCY REQUESTS.
FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE SITE'S ONGOING COMPLIANCE WITH FCC REGULATIONS AT AND T WILL COORDINATE WITH SUCH REQUEST AND CONFIRM THE SITE IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FCC REGULATIONS PUTS THE FULL ONUS
[00:20:01]
ON THE TOWN WHERE IN REALITY IT'S AT AND T THAT MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE AND MUST BE ABLE TO ASSURE THE TOWN IT IS.SO IF A MODIFICATION IS TO IS BEING MADE, THEY MUST COME TO THE TOWN BEFORE THEY MAKE A MODIFICATION, NOT RELY ON THE TOWN TO FIND THEM.
ALL MODIFICATIONS REQUIRE, I'M SORRY, ALL ALL MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO COME REQUIRED AN APPLICATION TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT? CORRECT.
SO THIS LETTER IS ACTUALLY, UM, AND IT'S, IT'S CALLED AT AND T ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST APPLICATION.
IT'S SIGNED BY VINCENT CAPELLI.
AND FIRST OF ALL, THIS PERSON IS NOT AT ALL IN ANY PLACE NOTED AS SOMEONE WHO HAS ANY CREDENTIALS TO BE WRITING SOMETHING FOR THIS DOCUMENTATION, UH, FOR THIS APPLICATION, BUT IT ALSO PUTS THE ONUS ON THE TOWN, AND I DON'T BELIEVE THE TOWN DOES THAT AND THEY HAVE TO COME IF THERE'S ANY, IF THEY BECOME IN VIOLATION OF TOWN CODE, THE TOWN'S NOT REQUIRED TO FIND THAT.
THEY TO CONSTANTLY LOOK AT ON THE LOOKOUT FOR SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO CHEAT THE TOWN AT.
AND THE NEXT LETTER IS INTERFERENCE LETTER AT AND T ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF THEIR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH EXISTING CELLULAR CARRIERS.
RADIO, TELEVISION, TELEPHONE, AND LIKE APPLIANCES IN THE EVENT AT AND T INSTALLATIONS INTERFERE WITH SUCH EQUIPMENT AT AND T WILL CEASE SUCH INTERFERENCE AFTER NOTICE THEREOF WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME, EXCEPT FOR THE BRIEF TESTING NECESSARY FOR THE ELIMINATION OF INTERFERENCE AND UNTIL AT AND T IS ABLE TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM.
UM, I SUGGEST AGAIN THAT THE APPLICANT GO AND LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN OTHER APPLICATIONS, WHICH IS VERY SIMPLE AND TO THE POINT AT T HAS PROVIDED APPLICANTS ON BEHALF OF AT T HAVE PROVIDED THAT LANGUAGE FOR LITERALLY DECADES.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHY THIS LANGUAGE UNDER IN THIS APPLICATION IS CHANGING.
UM, A NOISE PROFILE OF THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT.
THIS IS PA NOTE I NEED TO WRITE.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PA NOTE NOISE PROFILE OF THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CLEARLY SHOWING COMPLIANCE.
I'M SORRY, I WANNA GO BACK AND NOTE UNDER I, UM, FRANCIS, I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE YOU HAVE A SUGGESTION WHERE TO NOTE HOW OUTRAGEOUS THAT STATEMENT IS THAT THE, IF THE TOWN NOTICES A CHANGE IN THAT DOCUMENT, IF YOU CAN THINK OF WHERE I SHOULD NOTE THAT THAT HAS TO BE CORRECTED, UM, IN THIS COMPLETION FORM, THAT WOULD BE APPRECIATED.
I THINK IT'S WHERE THEY REFER YOU TO APPENDIX C, ISN'T IT? THAT'S THE QUESTION ABOUT INTERFERENCE.
THERE'S ALSO, OKAY, MAYBE IT'S THE MONITORING PLAN, UM, AND THAT'S PART OF THE NEAR LEVEL.
I HOPE THE APPLICANT WILL TAKE THE TIME TO LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO BECAUSE, UM, IT IS, I I CANNOT REITERATE FREQUENTLY ENOUGH HOW UNFORTUNATE IT'S THAT THEY DECIDED NOT TO ATTEND.
OKAY, I'M GONNA PUT IT UNDER A MONITORING PLAN.
AND I SEE FROM THE EMAIL CHAIN, THEY WERE ALSO INVITED BY ZOOM IF THEY WANTED TO ATTEND BY ZOOM, CORRECT? I I I OFFERED TO SEND THEM A ZOOM LINK AND I OFFERED, YOU KNOW, THEY COULD COME OR, OR, OR PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM AND THEY DECLINED BOTH OFFERS.
THE ANTENNA BOARD HAD NO OBLIGATION.
ACTUALLY, WE'VE BEEN MAKING THIS VIDEO SINCE THE MEMBERS ARE PRESENT IN PERSON.
[00:25:01]
UM, BUT WE DO IT BECAUSE WE WANT THERE TO BE FULL TRANSPARENCY IN WHAT'S GOING ON, BUT IT IS HIGHLY UNUSUAL.THE APPLICANT DOESN'T SHOW UP.
IT'S ALMOST UNIQUE, I WOULD SAY SINCE BEFORE COVID, SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE COVID, EVERY APPLICANT HAS SHOWN UP.
AND ON AND DURING COVID IT WAS VIA, VIA ZOOM.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ALL CHANGES TO THE TOWN, CORRECT THE LETTER REMOVING LANGUAGE SCHEDULES AND EXHIBIT C, NOT SCHEDULE C.
OKAY, SO WE WERE UP TO THE NOISE PROFILE AND THE NOISE PROFILE IS PA NOISE PROFILE OF THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CLEARLY SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER THREE 80 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF GREENBURG.
AGAIN, IT'S ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT C IS A NOISE PROFILE PREPARED BY AEROSMITH INC.
DATED 2 26 25, WHICH IS STAMPED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER.
AGAIN, NOBODY SUBMITTED TO AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION CONFIRMING COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN OF GREENBURG CODE TWO 80 DASH FOUR.
SO IF WE GO TO SCHEDULE THE EXHIBIT C, AGAIN, I'M GOING BACK TO THE BEGINNING OF EXHIBIT C.
THE FIRST PART OF EXHIBIT C IS AN EM, IT'S A REPORT OF FCC COMPLIANCE REPORT OR CLAIM TO BE, WHICH DOES NOT MEET, DOES NOT ANSWER OUR QUESTIONS FOR NEAR FOLLOWING.
THAT IS A LETTER THAT TELLS THE TOWN THAT IF THEY SEE THEM NOT COMPLYING OR MAKING A CHANGE, THE TOWN CAN RESPOND.
UM, THEN THERE IS AN INTERFERENCE LETTER.
AND THE LAST THING HERE, WE'VE ALWAYS RECEIVED A, A NOISE REPORT.
THIS IS A NOISE EVALUATION AND WHAT IT READS IS TO, TO WHOM IT MAY.
AT THE TOP OF IT, IT HAS THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SITE AND IT SAYS, TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, AS YOU REQUEST, AEROSMITH ENGINEERING HAS CONDUCTED A REVIEW OF EXISTING AT AND T ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT UPGRADE AT THE REFERENCE SITE TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE WITH THE NOISE REGULATIONS OUTSIDE, UM, OUTLINED IN CHAPTER THREE 80 OF THE TOWN OF GREENBURG CODE, BASED ON OUR EVALUATION, THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT IS EXPECTED TO RESULT IN A NEGLIGENCE INCREASE IN THE NOISE LEVEL EMITTED FROM THE SITE.
THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE, THE TELECO, I'M SORRY, THE TELECORDIA GIVES THE, UM, SEC, UH, TELCORDIA GR DASH 4 87 DASH CORE ISSUE FIVE SECTION 3.34 NOISE STANDARD, WHICH SPECI SPECIFIES A LIMIT OF 45 DBA SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER THAN THE 65 DBA LIMIT ESTABLISHED IN THE TOWN CODE, UM, CHAPTER THREE 80 DASH SEVEN C.
THIS EVALUATION IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT ALL EQUIPMENT IS AN OPTIMAL CONDITION, HAS NOT BEEN MODIFIED FROM THE MANUFACTURER'S ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS THAT HAS BEEN INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS.
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US AT ENGINEERING, UM, AT AEROSMITH DEVELOPMENT.COM.
QUESTION FOR YOU, MR. SHEEN FRANCIS.
UM, THERE'S NO REPORT AND THERE'S NO INFORMATION.
YOU KNOW THE NOISE ORDINANCE BETTER THAN ANYBODY.
DOES THIS MEET THE REQUIREMENT THAT WE'VE HAD IN THE PAST? WELL, IT DID UNTIL IT SAID THAT THE ASSUMPTION RIGHT, UM, THAT THEY'RE ALL OPERATING, WHICH MEANS IT WASN'T AN ACTUAL MEASUREMENT DONE RIGHT?
[00:30:03]
SO I SHALL WRITE AN, AN ACTUAL REPORT OF ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS.A REPORT OF ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS IS REQUIRED, RIGHT? AND IT SHOULD ALSO SAY, YOU KNOW, WHERE WAS THE MEASUREMENT TAKEN FROM? I, IT WAS GOING WELL UNTIL THAT POINT.
THE, IT'S A PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF THE MODIFICATION PROPOSED.
SHOULD THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED FOR CLEAR ARTICULATION? THE FINAL AND FINAL SINGULAR AND CURRENT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE IS TO BE REFERENCED, REFERENCED AS DETAILED BELOW.
THIS WORK WILL FOLLOW THE INSTALLATION OF THE DUNNAGE PROPOSED BY THE PRO PROPERTY OWNER.
SPECIFICALLY, IT WILL FOLLOW THE ISSUANCE OF THE CER CERTI CERTI CERTIFIC CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION AND OR OCCUPANCY REQUIRED FOR SUCH WORK BY THE TOWN OF GREENBURG.
THIS FOUR WEEK SCHEDULE REFLECTS A REALISTIC TIMELINE, ALLOWING FLEXIBILITY FOR CONTRACTORS TO ARRIVE ON THE ON SITE MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED ANY REQUISITE INSPECTIONS TO BE COMPLETED.
THE TIMELINE PERMITS THE NE THE NECESSARY FLEXIBILITY WHILE THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE UNDERTAKEN.
THE TOTAL BUILD OUT WILL TAKE ROUGHLY FOUR WEEKS FOR SLASH ONE MONTH TO COMPLETE WITH WORK TO COMMENCE FOLLOWING THE INSTALLATION OF THE ROOF DUNNAGE BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND ISSUANCE BY THE TOWN OF GREENBURG OF THE NECESSARY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AND OR OCCUPANCY AS DEEMED REQUIRED BY THE TOWN OF GREENBURG BUILDING DEPARTMENT WEEK ONE, DAY ONE THROUGH SEVEN, INSTALLATION OF NEW CABINETS, INSTALLATION, NEW, NEW CONDUITS FOR POWER, TELECOMMUNICATION AND ALARMS. WEEK TWO, PREPARED EXISTING EIGHT THROUGH 14, PREPARED EXISTING EQUIPMENT FOR RELOCATION, INSTALL ANTENNAS, REMOTE U RADIO UNITS, RADIO, UM, ROUTE RADIO FREQUENCY, ALSO REFERENCED, UM, CA UH, CABLING BACK FOR INSTALLATION, FLY AND SECURE NEW HYBRIDS, GC CABLE PAIRS AND FIBER BUNDLES.
WEEK THREE, INTEGRATION DECOMMISSION AND TRANSFER OF REQUIRING BASEBAND UNITS TO NEW CABINETS.
NEW 6 1 6 0 CABINET TRANSFER OF EXISTING HYBRID LINES, CABLE PAIR AND FIBER BUNDLES TO NEW EXISTING TO NEW 6 1 6 0 REMOVAL OF ALL COAXIAL AND COAXIAL AND ANTENNAS.
WEEK FOUR, CLOSEOUT PICTURE AND CLEAN, UM, PICTURES AND CLEANUP.
CONFIRM THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK COMPLETED, INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF ANY NECESSARY SIGNAGE, OUTREACH TO TOWN OF GREENBURG TO CLOSE OUT ANY RE RELEVANT PERMITS.
THEY DON'T REALLY TALK AS THEY GO ALONG IN THE INSTALLATION.
THEY'RE TALKING WEEK THREE OF THE REMOVAL OF ALL COAXIAL, COAXIAL AND ANTENNAS.
NOWHERE IN HERE DID THEY EVER CLEARLY STATE HOW MANY ANTENNAS THEY ARE REMOVING OR HOW MANY ANTENNAS THEY ARE INSTALLING OR OR UPGRADING.
ANOTHER THING THAT IS MISSING FROM THIS, AND IT SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE THE BEGINNING, WHICH IS THEY MUST STATE THAT NO ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION IS REQUIRED.
WE HAVE NO IDEA IF THEY PLAN ON DOING ANYTHING, UM, ON THE GROUND TO FACILITATE THIS INSTALLATION.
SO I'M GOING BACK TO ADD THAT WHEN IT HAS NOT BEEN REQUIRED AS A ROOF MOUNT, THEY STATE NO EXCAVATION IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT IS A ROOF MOUNT.
BUT WHO KNOWS IF WHAT IS REQUIRED HERE IS LISTED IN THE
[00:35:01]
CONSIDERATIONS ON THIS.IF I COULD, YEAH, IF I CAN GO BACK TO THAT NOISE.
UH, OR, UM, I THINK IT'S OKAY FOR EQUIPMENT THAT HASN'T BEEN INSTALLED YET, THAT THEY USE THE MANUFACTURERS NOISE LEVELS, BUT FOR THE EXISTING CONDITIONS THERE SHOULD BE A READING 'CAUSE OBVIOUSLY, HOW DO THEY TAKE A READING OF SOMETHING THAT'S NOT UP YET FOR MANU? HOW DID YOU SAY THAT FOR MANUFACTURERS? IN OTHER WORDS, UH, THE EQUIPMENT PROBABLY HAS SOME TYPE OF A RATING ON IT AS TO WHAT ITS NOISE LEVEL WOULD BE IF IT'S NOT INSTALLED YET.
YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO TAKE, TAKE THAT, UM, NUMBER AND WHATEVER DIS DISTANCE THEY APPLY AND HAVE THEM APPLY IT.
BUT THEY'RE SAYING THERE'S NO SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OVER BASICALLY BASELINE, BUT THEY, IT DOESN'T APPEAR THEY MEASURED BASELINE.
MAYBE THEY DID, BUT THEY SHOULD BE CLEAR IN WHAT THEY WRITE.
GIVEN HOW SMALL AND HOW MANY PRINTS.
USING THE MANUFACTURER'S NUMBERS FOR WHAT HAS NOT YET BEEN INSTALLED IS ACCEPTABLE FOR BUT FOR WHAT EXISTS NOW, IT MUST BE MEASURED.
YEAH, I KNOW YOU'D SAY IT DIFFERENTLY, BUT IS THAT NO, THAT'S FINE.
THE LISTING HERE OF WHAT'S HAPPENING IS NOT REFLECTIVE IN THEIR ORIGINAL LIST OF WORK TO BE DONE.
THEY SHOULD REFLECT EACH OTHER AND THAT DOESN'T, I ANTICIPATE WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN HERE IS THEY'RE GONNA GET THIS, THEY'RE GONNA SAY, WE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS.
WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO HAVE A MEETING AGAIN AND HOPEFULLY THEY'LL ATTEND THAT ONE.
SO I'M GONNA DIRECT THEM TO WATCH THE VIDEO, RIGHT? WELL, YES, BUT I ASSUME THAT'S WHY WE'RE I UNDERSTAND.
THIS CAUSES UNNECESSARY DELAY.
THESE ARE TROUBLE FINDING THIS ONE, ONE MOMENT.
R SO WHAT I WROTE ON, UM, FOR PROPOSED INSTALLATION, THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR INSTALLATION COMPLETION OF THE MODIFY, UH, MODIFICATION PROPOSAL, UM,
[00:40:01]
SHOULD THE APPLICANT BE APPROVED, I WROTE SHOULD BE REFLECTIVE OF OUR, OF AN, OF AN INCLUSIVE LIST NOT YET PROVIDED IN G SO THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO MATCH UP.THIS JUST TELLS US WHEN IT'S GONNA HAPPEN.
THAT TELLS US WHAT THE GENERAL LAYOUT IS INCLUDING NO EXCAVATION, WHICH THEY DIDN'T INCLUDE.
BUT, SO THIS IS INCOMPLETE IN OUR, IF THE EXISTING U UTILIZE CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS DOCUMENTATION, I'M SORRY.
IF THE EXISTING FACILITY UTILIZES CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION WILL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS IN THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION WILL NOT DEFEAT SAID CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS.
IT SAYS THE POLYCARBONATE FIBERGLASS ANTENNAS WILL BE MANUFACTURED LIGHT GRAY AND THEY GIVE THE NUMBER TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING, WHICH COMPRISES AN AESTHETIC CHOICE.
THE BATTERY AND EQUIPMENT CABINET WILL BE, UM, ALUMINUM WHILE THE ANTENNA PIPE PA, WHILE THE ANTENNA PIPE PASTS WILL BE GALVANIZED.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT PASTS ARE GALVANIZED STEEL, THE COLOR OF WHICH WILL, WILL BLEND IN WITH THE SURROUNDINGS AND AN AESTHETIC CHOICE.
PLEASE NOTE THAT T-MOBILE FA UH, FACILITY WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE ROOFTOP IS ALSO LIGHT GRAY TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING.
THE CURRENT AND PROPOSED ANTENNAS DO NOT AND WILL NOT UTILIZE ANY CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS.
THEREFORE, THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
ACTUALLY WE, THIS IS AN, A LONG-TERM SITE.
WE WENT THROUGH A LOT ABOUT MA MAKING SURE THAT THE COLOR OF THE CELL SITES WHERE THEY ARE NOT BEHIND ANYTHING, THEY CLEARLY MATCH IT.
AND WE ARE ALSO VERY CONSCIOUS OF THE FACT THAT YOU THROWING AROUND THE TERM AESTHETIC CHOICE IS NOT THE ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD'S AESTHETIC CHOICE AND SHOULD NOT BE ASSUMED TO BE.
UM, WE ARE ALWAYS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE CABINET'S VISIBILITY AND WHAT COLOR THEY ARE TO MATCH THE ANTENNAS AND THE VISIBILITY.
AND THIS ACTUALLY DOESN'T ADDRESS IT WHERE THERE'S A LOT OF INFORMATION PROVIDED.
SO I I WOULD LIKE WHEN YOU SAY THAT IT'S NOT THE ARBS, UH, COLOR CHOICE, WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THEY'RE TELLING YOU THE COLOR.
I I NO, ACTUALLY I'M REFERRING TO THE, THE, THE DETERMINATION THAT THEY ARE MAKING THE CONCLUSION THAT THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE AESTHETIC CHOICE.
IF THEY WERE TO SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, THIS IS THE SAME COLOR THAT IT WAS LAST TIME, OR THEY ARE TO SAY THAT IT MATCHES IDENTICALLY WITH AN APPLICATION YOU APPROVED IN SUCH AND SUCH A DATE, THAT WOULD NOT BE ASSUMING THAT THEY MAKE THAT DECISION.
AND THE WAY THIS IS WRITTEN, IT'S SAYING THAT THEY ARE MAKING THAT DETERMINATION.
I ALSO DON'T KNOW WHAT A PAS, IT'S ULTIMATELY THE INTENT BOARD THAT MAKES THAT DETERMINATION.
I JUST WANTED TO BE CLEAR BASED ON YOUR STATEMENT THAT THE ANTENNA BOARD IS THE ONE THAT SAYS THAT'S THE RIGHT COLOR OR NOT THE RIGHT COLOR.
SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT VISIBILITY.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PAST.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WORD IS.
AND IF THE APPLICANT WERE HERE, I COULD ASK THE APPLICANT, FIRST OF ALL, WHILE THE ANTENNAE, IT'S NOT ANTENNAE, IT'S ANTENNAS, ANTENNAE ARE THOSE ANTENNAE THAT BELONG TO AN ANT, UM, WHILE THE ANTENNAE'S PIPE PASS WILL BE GALVANIZED STEEL.
WHAT ARE THE, DOES DO EITHER OF, YOU KNOW WHAT A ANTENNAE PIPE PASS? P-A-S-T-S-P-S-T-S-P-A-S-T-S, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A MISSPELLING.
SO WHAT I THINK IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE, JUST LIKE WHEN WE FIRST DEALT WITH 3 99 NOEL WOOD, WE WERE VERY FOCUSED ON THE FACT THAT THE ANTENNA SHOULD MATCH THE BUILDING.
AND WHEN THEY CAME TO TWO 80, WE WERE VERY CLEAR ON THAT IT SAYS HERE TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUILDING, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY IT IS THE SAME COLOR AS THE PRE AS IT WAS BEFORE.
SO THAT IS WHAT I'M GOING TO NOTE HERE.
THIS IS, THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW AND WE NEED TO KNOW WHETHER THE CABINETS ARE VISIBLE AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY WILL BE THE SAME COLOR AS THE ONES THAT WE ORIGINALLY APPROVED.
[00:45:54]
OKAY? SI SHOULD HAVE READ, READ THIS ALSO AS PART OF THE ANSWER TO THE AESTHETIC.IT GIVES A LOCATION OF THE ANTENNA, BUT IT DOESN'T, IT SAYS A APPROXIMATE LOCATION, SIZE, ELEVATION, HEIGHT OF PROPOSED ANTENNA AND EQUIPMENT.
ALL EQUIPMENT INSTALLED AT CENTER LINE OF 62 FEET ON THE EXISTING ROOFTOP.
I DON'T KNOW WHY THIS IS HERE.
THIS IS PART OF THE R EXISTING.
AND THEN THE NEXT PART OF THAT, EXISTING ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT, ALL EXISTING ANTENNAS INSTALLED IN THE CENTER LINE.
UM, AND IT SAYS PROPER SIGNAGE IS LOCATED ON THE OUTER PROP PREMISES OF THE SITE.
I THINK THIS WAS SOMEONE DID A BAD CUT AND PASTE BECAUSE THIS DOESN'T ADDRESS TO MY EYE AT LEAST R SINCE THE PAGES ARE NOT NUMBERED, IT'S HARD TO IDENTIFY.
SA PLAN ILLUSTRATING THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION, SIZE, ELEVATION, AND HEIGHT OF ALL PROPOSED AND EXISTING ANTENNAS AND ALL A PERTINENT STRUCTURES IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE DIMENSIONS CHANGES TO THE ELIGIBLE STRUC SUPPORT STRUCTURE AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION.
THE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE ANTENNAS AND ALL RELATED FIXTURES, STRUCTURES OF PERS AND APPARATUS INCLUDING HEIGHT ABOVE UNDISTURBED GRADE, ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE, AND SEA LEVEL MATERIALS, COLOR SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING.
THE NAME OF THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF EACH ANTENNA SHALL BE DELINEATED ON THE PLAN ELEVATION.
MEASUREMENTS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR UTILITY POLLS IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS.
SO WE ARE DIRECTED TO GO TO EXHIBIT E.
THE PLAN ILLUSTRATIONS ILLUSTRATION CAN BE FOUND ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PLANS THAT ARE ENCLOSED AND STAMPED BY THE NEW YORK STATE LICENSED ENGINEER, YET SOMEONE ELSE WHO'S NOT IDENTIFIED AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS APPLICATION.
SO IF I GO TO THIS, I DO NOT SEE JUST ABOUT ANY OF THE THINGS ASKED FOR.
I DON'T SEE A PLAN ILLUSTRATING THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION.
OKAY, SO AS I SAID, THERE'S NO PLAN THE SIZE AND ELEVATION AND HEIGHT OF ALL PROPOSED AND EXISTING ANTENNAS.
[00:50:02]
SO GENERALLY WHAT WE DO IS WE GO TO A SITE AS SEEN ON A OH THREE TO C, THE ANTENNAS.I SEE NO OTHER ANTENNAS ON THIS OTHER, I SEE EXISTING AT AND T COMMSCOPE, I DON'T SEE T-MOBILE ANYWHERE HERE.
SO I'M NOT SEEING ALL THE ANTENNAS.
I'M ALSO NOT HAVING ALL THE, ALL THE MATERIAL, ALL THE EQUIPMENT IDENTIFIED, ALL THE PERTINENT STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED.
ALSO THE HEIGHT OF THE VARIOUS THINGS IS NOT IDENTIFIED.
ALSO, WE DON'T HAVE, WE REQUIRE BOTH AS WRITTEN HERE.
WE REQUIRE BOTH UM, ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE AND C LEVEL.
WE DON'T HAVE IT FOR THE BUILDING.
WE DON'T HAVE IT FOR ANY OF THE PERTINENT STRUCTURES.
I WOULD AGAIN RECOMMEND STRONGLY T T-MOBILE WAS IN NOT TOO LONG AGO FOR THIS SPECIFIC SITE.
I WOULD SUGGEST STRONGLY THAT THIS APPLICANT GO BACK AND ASK THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO VIEW THAT SO THEY GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT'S REQUIRED.
WE CANNOT MOVE AHEAD WITH THIS.
AGAIN, I DON'T SEE ON HERE WHERE THE COLOR IS NOTED OF SOME OF THE ITEMS. PERHAPS IF THE APPLICANT WERE HERE, THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO DIRECT TO WHAT PAGE OR WHAT, WHERE TO LOOK.
I DON'T SEE WHERE THE SIGN, IT SAYS SIGNAGE.
A PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE ANTENNAS AND ALL RELATED FIXTURE STRUCTURES OF PERS AND APPARATUS INCLUDING HEIGHT ABOVE UN DISTURBED GRADE, ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE, AND SEA LEVEL MATERIALS, COLOR SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING.
IT'S ALL SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE PLANS AND I DON'T SEE IT.
NOW IF IT IS HERE, IF THE APPLICANT WERE HERE, THEY COULD PROVIDE DIRECTION BUT THEY PROVIDED NO DIRECTION OF WHERE TO FIND THAT THE NAME AND OWNER OF UH, I'M SORRY THE NA, THE NAME OF THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF EACH ANTENNA SHALL BE DELINEATED.
SO WE HAVE SOME OF THIS HERE FOR AT AND T.
WE DON'T HAVE ALL OF THIS HERE FOR AT AND T AND WE DON'T HAVE THE OTHER PROVIDERS THAT ARE NOTED IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT'S LETTER.
SO THIS IS COMPLETELY A DISASTER.
S YOU PERMITS ISSUED FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES SHALL, NO, I'M ON, SORRY, I SHOULD BE ON TA WIRE.
ALL WIRELESS FACILITIES SHALL POST A STAINLESS STEEL OR ALUMINUM PLATE SIGN IN A READILY VISIBLE LOCATION IDENTIFYING THE OWNER'S MOST RECENT PERMIT NUMBER AND THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF SUCH PERMIT AND THE NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF A PARTY TO CONTACT IN THE EVENT OF EMERGENCY.
THE ONLY OTHER SIGNAGE PERMITTED SHALL BE THE, THAT REQUIRED BY THE FCC OR ANY OTHER FEDERAL OR STATE AGENCY.
ALL SIGNAGE ASSOCIATED WITH A WIRELESS FACILITY SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ANTENNA REVIEW BOARD.
REQUIRED SIGNAGE SHALL BE MOUNTED NO HIGHER THAN FIVE FEET FROM ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
PLEASE SEE SHEET NUMBER A OH SEVEN EQUIPMENT, DETAILS OF THE ENCLOSED CONSTRUCTION DRAWING PLANS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS.
IT DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO HERE WITH THE REQUIRED SIGN THAT STATES THE PERMIT NUMBER AND THE APPROVAL DATE SO THAT THAT SIGN IS MISSING COMPLETELY.
[00:55:01]
ANYTHING THAT SAYS THAT THE SIGN WILL BE FIVE FEET OR LOWER.AND I SEE NOTHING ABOUT WHAT THE SIGN WILL BE MADE OF.
SHE'S RIGHT, THIS IS ADDED TO THE FACT THAT IT'S NOT TO MY EYE.
I COULDN'T FIND WHERE THEY WERE PUTTING IT ON THE, IN, IN S WHERE IT IS BEING PLACED BECAUSE IT'S NOT ON THE PLANS.
YOU PERMIT ISSUED FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES SHALL BE VALID FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS.
PERMITS ARE SUBJECT TO RENEWAL AT THE END OF THE FIVE YEAR PERIOD FOR A SUCCESSIVE FIVE YEAR TERM.
SO LONG AS THE INSTALLATION COMPLIES WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF GREENBURG IN ENFORCED AT THE TIME OF RENEWAL, NO ADDITIONAL FEES SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE RENEWAL OF SUCH PERMITS.
WE HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THE LENGTH AND RENEWAL PROCESS OF PERMITS ISSUED FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES.
AT AND T WILL COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT, WHICH AT FACE VALUE MAKES THIS COMPLETE.
HOWEVER, THEY DO SAY AND AND WE'VE CITED IT IN SOMETHING ELSE, THAT IT'S NOT THE TOWN'S JOB TO FIND OUT IF THEY'RE IN VIOLATION.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHETHER I SHOULD, THIS IS UP TO YOU FRANCIS, AND YOUR ADVICE WOULD BE APPRECIATED WHETHER WE SHOULD MARK IT COMPLETE AND THEN CITE THAT ELSEWHERE.
BUT THE MERE FACT THAT THAT LETTER SAYS THAT IF THE TOWN FINDS SOMETHING WRONG, IS THIS, IS THAT IN THE SAME SITE? ARE THEY REFERRING TO THAT SAME LETTER? THEY DON'T REFER TO IT AT ALL HERE, NO.
UM, IT DOES SEEM LIKE IT HITS THE BULLET POINTS THOUGH.
HAVE YOU HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT V WHICH IS THE INSURANCE PROPERTY INSURANCE FOR PROP, UM, PROPERTIES REPLACEMENT.
THEY NEED, THEY NEED TO INCLUDE ON THAT, THE ACTUAL ADDRESS OF THE SITE, NOT JUST THEIR CODE FOR THE SITE.
THEY SAY HARTSDALE WHAT A CODE, BUT THERE'S NO REFERENCE TO WHAT THAT CODE MEANS ON THAT INSURANCE CERTIFICATE UNLESS THERE'S A SEPARATE PAGE, UM, THAT HAS THAT.
AND IF THERE IS, IT HAS TO BE ATTACHED IN SOMEWHERE.
I'D RATHER IT'S MUCH BETTER, MUCH CLEANER JUST TO PUT IT RIGHT IN THE BOX.
PUT IT RIGHT IN THE BOX HARD STA WITH THEIR NUMBER AND THEN PUT THE ADDRESS.
I PROPERTY INSURANCE AT WORKMAN'S COMP.
YEAH, WE DON'T GET INTO WORKMAN'S COMP SO MUCH, BUT IT'S THE, UH, I DIDN'T SEE THE ADDRESS THERE ON WORK, WORK WORKER'S COMP, BUT JUST, JUST PUT FOR THE UM, INSURANCE IN, IN GENERAL, IT HAS TO HAVE THE, THE SITE.
THE ADDRESS, THE ACTUAL ADDRESS.
I, I DON'T NEED TO INCLUDE THE ACTUAL ADDRESS OF THE SITE IN THE BOX.
SO I MOVE THAT WE DE THIS APPLICATION INCOMPLETE.
DO I HAVE A SECOND DONNA? YES YOU DO.
NOW, NORMALLY I WOULD PAUSE THIS, GO UPSTAIRS TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, GET THIS CHECKLIST STAMPED, COME BACK DOWNSTAIRS, WE WOULD RESTART THE VIDEO AND I WOULD HAND IT TO THE APPLICANT BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS NOT HERE.
I WILL DO THE STAMPING AFTER WE ADJOURN THE MEETING AND ASK THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO SEND THEM THE, UM, INITIALED INCOMPLETE.
DOES ANYONE HAVE OBJECTIONS TO THAT? NO.
[01:00:01]
THIS INCOMPLETE.WE, WE UNANIMOUSLY DECIDED IT WAS INCOMPLETE.
AND NORMALLY YOU WOULD HAVE THE APPLICANT INITIAL AS WELL, CORRECT? CORRECT.
THAT'S BEEN THE GREAT THING OF HAVING, THE WAY WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS IS THE APPLICANT GETS TO REVIEW ALL THE COMMENTS TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS CLEAR AND IF THEY NEED CLARIFICATION OR THEY NEED THE LANGUAGE CHANGED AT ALL, WE CAN DISCUSS AND WE'RE HERE TO DO SO WITHOUT THE APPLICANT BEING WILLING TO ATTEND OR EVEN ZOOM.
BOY, MY INITIALS ARE ALL OVER THIS.
OKAY, SO ON THAT NOTE, I AM GOING TO MOVE THAT WE ADJOURN IT IS NOW 1217.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? YES, SECOND.