[00:00:01] IS TREATED FOR REPORTING IN PROGRESS. >> OH HI. [ TOWN OF GREENBURGH OFFICE OF THE TOWN BOARD 177 Hillside Avenue, Greenburgh, NY 10607 Tel: 914-989-1525 Fax: 914-993-1541 https://greenburghny.com/485/Watch-Live-Board-Meetings ] WELCOME TO OUR TOWN BOARD MEETING TODAY'S MAY 5TH AT 540 AND THE FIRST ITEM IS ODELL HOUSE CONTRACT 1066. GOOD TURNOUT. >> MY GOD, I GET THIS ONE ON. >> YES, GOOD AFTERNOON. I KNOW BEAUTIFUL. >> GOOD AFTERNOON, TOWN BOARD. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING US TO BE HERE WITH YOU THIS AFTERNOON. SUSAN SEALE AND I ARE HERE ON BEHALF OF OAKDALE HOUSE. WE HOPE THAT YOU'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE CONTRACT THAT WE SENT TO JOE AND WE JUST WANTED TO KNOW IF YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS ABOUT IT THAT WE COULD ADDRESS. IT'S WE HAVE A GRANT DEADLINE COMING UP ON MAY 31ST. SO IF WE CAN WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THIS CONTRACT FINALIZED BEFORE THEN BECAUSE WE NEED THE CONTRACT IN ORDER TO ATTACH IT TO THE GRANT APPLICATION SO WE CAN GET ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT. SO WE'RE JUST HERE TODAY TO SEE IF YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS FOR US THAT WE COULD OR YOU KNOW ISSUES TO FOR US TO CLARIFY FOR THE SAKE OF THE PUBLIC. DO YOU JUST WANT TO GIVE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF WHAT THIS IS ABOUT JUST SO PEOPLE LISTENING IN COULD FOLLOW? >> SURE. I'LL LET SUSAN DO THAT BECAUSE SHE'S OUR RESIDENT HISTORIAN. SO IN 2025 THE FRIENDS OF ODELL BECAME ODELL HOUSE ROCHAMBEAU HEADQUARTERS WHICH IS A CHARTERED NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION NONPROFIT. AND WE HAVE ALSO RECEIVED FROM THE BOARD OF REGENTS PERMISSION TO BE KNOWN AS THE ODELL ROSHUMBA MUSEUM WHICH IS SHORTER. >> SO WE LIKE THAT AND AS THE DESIGNATE IT CHARTER HOLDERS WE ARE THE PEOPLE TO RUN THE MUSEUM WHICH IS OWNED BY THE TOWN. SO THIS IS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN OUR NONPROFIT AND THE TOWN ALLOWING US TO MANAGE IT AS A MUSEUM AND PROVIDE FOR FUNDING TO HELP US DO THAT AND SORT OF SIMILAR ARRANGEMENT TO THE NATURE CENTER. CORRECT? ALTHOUGH THEY HAVE 15 EMPLOYEES AND A VERY LARGE BUDGET. >> YES. OKAY. WHEN DO YOU THINK WHEN DO YOU THINK WE'LL HAVE THE INSURANCE INFORMATION? >> SO WE JUST BRIEFLY HAD THAT DISCUSSION SO THAT THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF AN ONGOING DISCUSSION AND I SENT THE INFORMATION TO OUR BROKER AND I'M AWAITING QUOTES FROM HIM. I EXPECT TO RECEIVE THEM BY THIS COMING THURSDAY AND ONCE I DO I'LL DISSEMINATE ALL THAT INFORMATION OUT TO ALL PARTIES INVOLVED. >> BUT WE DO CURRENTLY HAVE COVERAGE THAT WE BELIEVE MEETS THE TOWN'S REQUIREMENTS AND IT DOES IT DOES. SO WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT OPTIONS IF THEY SHOULD BE ADDITIONALLY INSURED AND AND WHAT THOSE COSTS WOULD BE. THAT WAS THE ONLY QUESTION THAT REALLY CAME UP WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT IT WAS THE INSURANCE. THEY ALL SEEM VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD AND IT'S REALLY GOOD AND WE HAD ONE BACK AND FORTH ALREADY BETWEEN CAN AND I A COUPLE OF ITEMS WITHIN THE CONTRACT AND I HAVE A FEW MORE MINOR AMENDMENTS THAT I'LL PROPOSE TO THE TOWN AND YOU KNOW AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BUT I THINK WE'RE PRETTY CLOSE. SO WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US IS WHAT THEY HAVE SEEN AND ACCEPTED AND THEN THEIR PROPOSED CHANGES ON THERE AS WELL. >> OKAY. SO WHOSE PURPLE AND WHO'S BLUE? WELL THAT'S FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION. OH I SEE. >> OKAY. ONCE THE ONCE THE MUSEUM IS OPENED WHAT ARE THE YOU KNOW COULD YOU GO OVER SOME OF YOUR FINANCING, YOU KNOW, GOALS YOU KNOW WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT THE TOWN TO DO? YOU KNOW WHAT YOU KNOW WHAT WOULD YOU HOPE YOU'RE NOT FOR PROFIT WILL DO YOU KNOW WELL WE DID WE DID GIVE YOU A BUDGET RIGHT? PROPOSED BUDGET. UM, IT'S SOMEWHAT THEORETICAL BUT WE WON'T BE OPEN UNTIL NEXT YEAR BECAUSE THE BUILDING DIDN'T GET FINISHED IN TIME. BUT YOU KNOW BASED ON OUR SURVEY OF OTHER SIMILAR SITES WE HAVE A CERTAIN EXPECTATION OF EXPENSES AND WE WILL BE CREATING A MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM, YOU KNOW, AND A GIFT GIVING PROGRAM AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO FUNDRAISE WITH GRANTS. I THINK THAT OUR RESPONSIBILITY REALLY WILL FOCUS ON THE CURATORIAL EXPERTISE AND THE BUILDING OF EXHIBITS AND WE WANT TO BE DYNAMIC. [00:05:07] WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE OH IT'S THE SAME OLD EXHIBITS WE'D LIKE TO HAVE LIKE NEXT YEAR COME THERE'S A NEW EXHIBIT YOU KNOW. SO THOSE ARE CURATORIAL EXPENSES BUT THAT'S THE KIND OF THING THAT CAN WAS REFERRING TO. THERE ARE GRANTS THAT PARTICULAR GRANT IS FOR RESTORATION OF ARTIFACTS YOUR ARTIFACTS THAT THE TOWN OWNS BUT THAT WE'RE RESEARCHING AND SOME OF THEM ARE QUITE EXTRAORDINARY AND SOME OF THEM NEED SOME WORK AND YOU KNOW, EVEN THE TINIEST LITTLE THING CAN COST $5,000. SO WE'RE TRYING TO GET GRANTS TO DO THAT WITH OKAY. OKAY. ONE THING I DID WANT TO CLARIFY I THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE IS THAT THE TOWN THIS CONTRACT IMPLIES ON PAGE TWO THAT THE TOWN STILL OWNS THE DOCUMENTS. IT DOES NOT WESTCHESTER COUNTY WAS GIVEN THE DOCUMENTS BY THE UTAH. >> OKAY. I THOUGHT THEY WERE THE OWNERSHIP OF THE TOWN TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. >> YOU KNOW I JUST CHECKED IT WITH OKAY I'LL I WILL CHECK ON THAT AS WELL AND MAKE ANY SENSE AS WELL. >> SORRY YOU DON'T HAVE TO INSURE THEM. OKAY, PERFECT. GOOD. >> SO THANK YOU. OKAY, GREAT. NEXT SHOW SO JOE, WE'LL BE IN WE'LL BE IN TOUCH. >> YES. OKAY. EXCELLENT. THANK YOU. >> OH, SO THE NEXT THING IS THE SOLAR AND I JUST TELL YOU, WILL, THERE'S AN EXHIBIT OPENING FRIDAY AT THE LIBRARY. OKAY. SOME OF YOUR THINGS, KARA, BECAUSE WE CAN'T SHOW THOSE TO THE PUBLIC. SO THE LIBRARY HAS THREE REALLY NICE CASES AND WE'RE PUTTING THEM UP AND THEY'LL BE THERE THROUGH THE MONTH OF JULY. OKAY, THAT'S TERRIFIC. I WILL. YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. WE'RE WE'RE LIKE DOING IT ALL AT THE LAST MINUTE BUT I WILL I'D LOVE TO PUBLICIZE IT SO I WANT EVERYBODY TO GO. >> GREAT. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JOE WOULD YOU PARK YOURSELF THERE? THANK SO OKAY, GREAT. >> SO WE'RE NOW GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE SOLAR CANOPIES. A VETERAN PARK WE HAVE OTHER PEOPLE JOINING US SO WE HAVE CARE AND WE HAVE A YEAH SAM IS AS PERRY ON OR GARRETT SIX SO HOLD ON OKAY WE'RE ACTUALLY EARLY HERE EARLY THAT NEVER HAD THAT EVER HAPPEN NO OKAY EXPECTED TO BE A SIX SO WHY CAN'T WE HAVE TEN MINUTES OKAY SO SINCE WE HAVE TEN MINUTES SIGNAL OKAY OKAY. OH, WHAT ABOUT THE REVIEW? YEAH. SO WE COULD IN THE INTEREST OF TIME FOIL PEEL TOWN SIGNAGE I DON'T KNOW. LET'S DO THE FOIL APPEAL. OKAY. FOIL PEEL THAT ONE. I DON'T HAVE MUCH TO ADD. LAST I HEARD MARK LAUGH AT THE APPLICANT WAS GOING TO SEND YOU. I NEVER GOT ANYTHING. I DIDN'T GET ANYTHING EITHER HE SEND OVER A AFFIRMATION STATING THAT PERSONAL EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT USED FOR TOWN PURPOSES AND INSTEAD ONLY POLITICAL PURPOSES . >> WE DO THIS NEXT WEEK. OKAY SO WE'RE STILL AHEAD OF TIME. OKAY. A TOWN SIGNING, RIGHT? YEAH. ON SIGNAGE. OKAY. UM, YOU KNOW, I'VE HAD SOME CONCERNS. UM, THE TOWN CLERK HAS ALSO HAD DIFFERENCES OF OPINIONS ON ON SIGNAGE IN THE LOBBY OVER THE OVER THE YEARS. I'VE ALWAYS PUT ON WINDOWS, YOU KNOW, SIGNAGE. UM, LAST YEAR THE TOWN CLERK REMOVED, YOU KNOW, SIGNS ON PUBLICIZING THE FARMER'S MARKET. WE WERE GIVING OUT FREE PRODUCE AND UM AND TOOK IT DOWN AND YOU KNOW THE TOWN ATTORNEY SPOKE TO THESE AND SAID THAT CAN'T BE DONE AND NOW WE HAVE A TOWN ARTS EVENT AT ARTS MARKET AND UM, SARAH BRACY WHITE PUT UP SIMILAR SIGNAGE YOU KNOW SIGN ADVERTISING THE FACT THAT THE MARKET THAT ART MARKET AND CRAFTS FAIR IS BEING HELD OH YEAH THE NOT THIS WEEKEND BUT THE FOLLOWING WEEKEND AND LISA TOOK THAT DOWN AND I SAID THAT SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE IT DOWN BECAUSE IT'S A TOWN SPONSORED EVENT AND I JUST FEEL THE TOWN BOARD SHOULD TAKE IT TAKE A STRONG POSITION ESPECIALLY WITH THE FARMER'S MARKET BECAUSE THE FARMER'S MARKET COLBY'S GOING TO START IT IN IN THE SUMMER AND IN AUGUST AND IT SERVES A VALUABLE PURPOSE. UM, WE'RE GIVING OUT ON FREE PRODUCE TO PEOPLE WHO NEED FOOD AND WE HAVE TO PUBLICIZE IT AND [00:10:03] WELL THESE ALL THESE EVENTS ARE IMPORTANT. WE KNOW THAT SO WE DON'T NEED TO TALK ABOUT THE SPECIFIC EVENTS JUST ABOUT A POLICY SO I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR THE COURT CLERK SO IN TERMS OF YOUR OBJECTION TO PUTTING STUFF UP, YOU HAD SAID TO ME ONE TIME IT'S IT CAN'T BE ON THE GLASS OR IS THAT VERY SPECIFIC IT CAN'T BE ON THE GLASS OR IS THEREREAS WHERE WE CAN HOST THINGS PLEASE I REALLY WANT YOU EXPLAIN FOR EVERYONE SO WE UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR PERSPECTIVE IS. >> SURE. THE PERSPECTIVE IS FOLLOWING THE LAW AND I REALLY WOULD PREFER TO GET THE LEGAL OPINION FROM OUR TOWN ATTORNEY RIGHT. >> WHICH WHICH LAWS ARE YOU REFERRING TO THE SIGNAGE LAW FOR THE COUNTY THE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS WITH TOWN CODE IT DOES NOT IT DOES NOT GIVE ANY SPECIFICS TO SIGNAGE IN THE TOWN CODE AND WITHIN TOWN HALL THERE ARE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR ATTENDANCE. RIGHT. I WANT TO MAKE THAT SO FOR ANYONE LISTENING IF YOU'RE PUTTING A SIGN UP ON YOUR PROPERTY THAT ARE UM SPECIFICALLY TALKING ABOUT TOWN HALL SIGNS A GOVERNMENT BUILDING OKAY SO AGAIN IS YOUR IS YOUR OBJECTION THAT IT'S ON THE GLASS THAT THAT'S OBSCURING SOMETHING OR ARE THERE OTHER PLACES WHERE WHERE FLIERS SHOULD BE? >> I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND MAYBE WE NEED TO HAVE A DIFFERENT AREA TO PUT THINGS UP. BUT WE DO HAVE A LOBBY WHERE THERE SHOULD BE SIGNAGE ALLOWED, RIGHT? >> AND BECAUSE IT IS A GOVERNMENT BUILDING AND THERE IS A LOCATION TO HAVE SIGN SIGNS PUT UP BUT AS I STATED I WOULD LIKE THE OPINION OF OUR TOWN ATTORNEY OKAY BUT THAT'S FINE. I WHAT WHAT AREA ARE YOU SAYING IS FOR THE SPECIFICALLY FOR THE SIGNS IN THE LOBBY? SURE THERE IS A HOLDER IN THE BACK THAT UM THE FARMER'S MARKET FAIL OUT THERE AND AFTER SHE WAS TOLD THAT SHE HAD TO NOT WHEN I WENT OUT MAYBE IT'S BETTER IF WE DON'T GET INTO THIS BUSINESS OF OH I'M JUST TALKING ABOUT AND MAYBE WE GET THE OPINION OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE INTERPRETATION IS ACCURATE OR NOT OR YEAH BUT I KNOW AND WE SHOULD BE NAMING NO, NO, NO NO BUT HE HE'S HE'S PUT OUT A NARRATIVE THAT I NEED TO CORRECT. >> NO BUT BUT OKAY BUT AGAIN JUST IF YOU COULD JUST EXPLAIN UNDERSTOOD THE AREA THAT WE KNOW SO LET'S LET HER ANSWER THE QUESTION LETTER AND YOU'RE NOT GOING TO INTERRUPT ME EITHER. OKAY. SO IF YOU COULD JUST EXPLAIN AGAIN THE AREA WHERE THERE'S A THERE'S A HOLD OR A SIGN HOLD SIGN HOLDER YEP. >> AND IS THERE A BULLETIN BOARD OF ANY KIND OF BULLETIN BOARDS ARE LIMITED TO GOVERNMENT INFORMATION UNLESS IT'S IN FOR EDUCATIONAL OR HISTORICAL. >> SO NOW SO SO IF THAT'S AN AREA THAT WE NEED INTERPRET IN I GUESS I GUESS SO YOU'RE SAYING THE BULLETIN BOARD THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE BECAUSE THERE WAS NEVER AN ISSUE BEFORE WE'VE ALWAYS HAD STUFF ON ON THE ANYTHING THAT WE WERE ADVERTISED AND WE ALWAYS PUT ON THEM THE WINDOWS AND STUFF BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE INCREASE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION. SO THIS THE THE BULLETIN BOARD THAT YOU HAVE MENTIONED OUT THERE, IS IT VISIBLE ENOUGH? I DON'T THINK IT IS. I THINK WE REALLY DON'T SEE IT. YOU REALLY CAN'T PAY ATTENTION. I JUST I THINK THIS IS WHY WE UTILIZE THE WINDOWS AND WE UTILIZE THE DESK SO WHEN PEOPLE WALK IN THEY KNOW WHAT TYPE OF EVENTS IS HAPPENING. SO I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE ISSUE IS BECAUSE WE'VE NEVER HAD THAT ISSUE. WE WE WELCOME THAT. WE WANT WE WANT COMMUNITY EVENTS TO HAPPEN. WE WANT TO PUBLICIZE THAT SO I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY WHAT AND THAT IS WHY WE HAVE A WEBSITE RIGHT BUT IT IT'S A GOVERNMENT ENTITY ENTITY AND IT VIOLATES THE THE LAW. OKAY SO SO WE NEED AN INTERPRETATION FROM THE TOWN ATTORNEY. WE ALSO NEED TO LOOK I MEAN I'D LIKE TO PHYSICALLY NOT RIGHT NOW GO INTO THE LOBBY AND SEE WHERE THERE MAY BE OTHER OPPORTUNITIES TO HAVE SOME YOU KNOW, PLACES FOR SIGNAGE THAT YOU FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE WITH OR WHATEVER. THAT'S A GOOD IDEA. WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR NO ONE ELSE HAD SOMETHING TO SAY. >> YEAH, OKAY. HOW ABOUT SHE'S THERE? OKAY, I'M IN TOWN. SHE'S IN TOWN SO SHE CAN BE RELOCATED WITH THE WITH THE SIGNAGE SO THAT IT'S MORE PROMINENT AND WE CAN PUT SIGNAGE FOR CURRENT EVENTS HERE. SO WHENEVER ALL TOWN EVENTS HERE SO IT CALLS ATTENTION TO THEM. >> YEAH. [00:15:01] >> TO DESIGNATE A BIGGER MORE VISIBLE AREA. WELL MAYBE WE CAN CORRECT A PERMANENT DIGITAL BOARD AND THEN WE COULD BE POSTING A DIFFERENT EVENTS. THE PROBLEM WITH THE WHAT UPSET ME LAST YEAR WITH THE FARMER'S MARKET IS HERE WE'RE GIVING FOOD FREE PERIOD I THOUGHT WE DID WAS WE TALKED ABOUT I'M THE ONE WHO GETS INTERRUPTED I'M THE ONLY ONE WHO GETS IN TROUBLE. I'M SPEAKING AND YOU CAN'T STOP ME. SO BASICALLY SO BASICALLY ALL I'M SAYING IS THAT THE FARMER'S MARKET IS SHE WAS TOLD WHERE TO PUT THE NO I WANTED TO WE'VE ALWAYS HAD IT ON THE WINDOWS. WE'VE ALWAYS PUBLICIZED IT. OKAY. WE'VE WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT EVERY ALL OF US COULD TALK WHATEVER WAY WE WANT. LET ME SAY SOMETHING. I BELIEVE THAT THE FARMER'S MARKET WINDOW WE SHOULD BE USING THE WINDOW TO PUBLICIZE THE FACT THAT WE'RE GIVING FREE FOOD. IT'S ILLEGALLY THAT IT'S NOT ILLEGAL. I BELIEVE THAT THE ARTS MARKET WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE IF WE COULD HAVE PUBLICIZED BECAUSE NOT EVERYBODY WALKS INTO THE LOBBY AND SEES IT. EVERYBODY SEES THE WINDOW. I'VE DONE IT FOR SINCE I'VE BEEN SUPERVISOR AND OTHER GROUPS HAVE DONE IT. WE'VE HAD STUDENTS IF THEY'VE HAD IF THEY HAVE HAD CLOTHING DRIVE, IF THEY'VE IF THEY'VE HAD FOOD DRIVES, IF IF THERE'S BEEN EVENTS SOME WE'VE ALWAYS USED THE WINDOWS AND WE'VE LET ANYBODY UP YOU KNOW PUBLICIZE AGAINST THE LAW THAT'S BASICALLY ALL THANK SO OKAY I GUESS I JUST HAVE TO EXCUSE ME SO ARE WE ARE WE GOING WITH GARRETT? GARRETT JOEL, YOU READY? YOU'RE DOING THE HEARTLAND? YES. OKAY. SO CARRY ON. THIS IS GETTING OKAY. NO. SO SHOULD WE DO THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL? IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WE CAN DO? WHILE WE WERE DRIVING I SAY NO BECAUSE THAT WAS GOING TO BE IN AT 615 ALTHOUGH I CAN EMAIL THEM RIGHT NOW UNLESS THEY'RE IN THE WAITING ROOM. >> OKAY. SO I DON'T KNOW. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE IN A MOMENT WHAT WE HAVE THREE MINUTES. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHO IT'S GOING TO GET ON THAT IS PIZZA OF AMMO IS AMMO IS AMMO SOMEBODY DOING LET ME TAKE A LOOK MAYBE THAT'S PROBABLY THE MEETING OWL MEETING. THANK YOU, JOY. IT WOULD BE SO GREAT. RIGHT? OKAY, GOOD. YOU'RE READY. >> IT COULD HAVE JUST USED AN EXTRA LETTER AND SAID OWL INSTEAD OF AMMO VIDEO. IT'S YOU SHOULD BE ON A NAME LIKE HOOTIE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. WELL, I USE A PROGRAM CALLED OWL. YEAH, RIGHT IN CHEMISTRY AND I SAID OWL GIVES A HOOT ABOUT YOU . >> YEAH. YEAH, IT GETS WORSE. ALL RIGHT. VARIOUS. HI, PERRY. HEY, GUYS. HOW ARE YOU? THANKS FOR JOINING US. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, LET'S GO DRAFT THOUGH SOME YOU KNOW I FORGET HOW ARE YOU LIKE I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO START WITH QUESTIONS OR IF YOU WANT ME TO JUST YOU KNOW, GIVE A SUMMARY OF WHERE THE LEGISLATION SITS RIGHT NOW. I'LL I'M HAPPY LET ME JUST START WITH THAT. SO YOU KNOW, SUBSTANTIVELY IT'S NOT AN ISSUE OF SUPPORT. BOTH SENATOR STEWART-COUSINS AND MARY JANE SHINSEKI ARE SUPPORTIVE OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE. >> IT'S REALLY JUST FINDING THE RIGHT WAY TO DO IT. SO YOU KNOW, WITH THE CLOCK TICKING IN ALBANY THE WAY THESE MATTERS HAVE BEEN HANDLED BEFORE MOST APPLICABLE WAS IN THE TOWN OF YORKTOWN WHICH I BELIEVE EVEN THE SAME VENDOR WAS TO DO, YOU KNOW, A FULL ALIENATION OF THE PROPERTY NOT THE AIR RIGHTS AND WHILE MAYBE, YOU KNOW, WE COULD PREVAIL ON AN ARGUMENT TO DO SOMETHING LESS THAN FULL ALIENATION WITH REALLY JUST A MONTH LEFT IN SESSION, THEY'RE GOING TO RECESS AND WE'RE STILL GOING TO BE MAKING THAT ARGUMENT. SO THE LAST CONVERSATION I HAD WITH MARY JANE SAID LOOK, THE SAFEST, QUICKEST THING TO DO WOULD BE ALIENATE THE PROPERTY WHICH GIVES YOU THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE VENDOR TO DO THE SOLAR INSTALL. THERE'S A REVERTER IN THE LEGISLATION WHICH SAYS IF THAT NO LONGER CONTINUES THE LAND GOES BACK FOR BECOMES PARK PARKLAND AGAIN. AND THEN THERE WAS A SUGGESTION TO ADD A COUPLE OF LINES IN THE DRAFT BILL ABOUT MADE SURING THAT DURING THE COURSE OF THE LEASE THAT THE THAT THE PARKING LOT REMAIN A PARKING LOT FOR THE PARK AND I RAN THAT BY ASSEMBLY STAFF TODAY A MARY JANE'S NEW LEGISLATOR DIRECTOR HE THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE OKAY SO THAT'S WHERE THINGS STAND UP HERE AND THAT BILL I THINK WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE. >> WE NEED A MEETS AND BOUNDS FOR THAT AND WE'RE RUNNING SHORT ON TIME TO GET THAT. [00:20:01] WE WON'T GET A BILL NUMBER UNLESS WE HAVE THE MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BUT THERE IS CERTAINLY AN UNDERSTANDING AND A SUPPORT OF WHAT THE TOWN WANTS TO DO. WE HAVE A DRAFT BILL OF TRADITIONAL ALIENATION. IT'S REALLY OUR ONLY CHOICE IF WE'RE GOING TO GET THIS DONE BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN THE LEGISLATURE RECESSES ON THE FOURTH AND THEY ARE AND IT'S A PRIMARY YEAR AND THEY'RE NOT GOING TO STAY HERE MUCH LONGER THAN THAT AND THEN TO DO THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT TO GET A BILL INTRODUCED WITH A MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT'S WHERE THINGS STAND UP HERE WE HAVE A MEETS AND BOUNDS FOR THE PARK WE DO NOT HAVE IT MEETS THE SUN, RIGHT? YES. YES. OKAY. WE DO NOT HAVE A MEETS AND BOUNDS BUT I DID REACH OUT TO THE PERSON WHO WAS DOING THE PARKING LOT PROJECT AND I THINK WE HAVE A SURVEY AND SO HE'S GOING TO SEND ME THAT HOPEFULLY TOMORROW AND IF WE DO THAT IT MIGHT BE ABLE TO SPEED THE PROCESS UP. I'LL HAVE TO BE WORKING WITH JASON FOR THAT BUT WHY CAN'T WE TAKE THE MEETS AND BOUNDS FOR THE PARKING LOT IF WE HAVE WE EVENTUALLY HAVE THAT AND JUST CARVE OUT THE AREA FOR THE SOLAR PANELS AND ONLY ALIENATE I'M NOT SURE THAT WE HAVE IT. THAT'S WHY WE HAVE TO LOOK AND SEE FIRST HE'S GOT TO LOOK AT SEE WHAT IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT IF WE HAVE TO GET SOMEBODY VERY QUICKLY TO DO A SURVEY RATHER THAN DO THE ENTIRE PARKING LOT WHICH IS ENORMOUS WITH ALL THE LITTLE CUTS AND SO FORTH JUST DOING A RECTANGLE IN THE AREA WHERE THE WE INTEND TO HAVE THE SOLAR PANELS WOULD ALLEVIATE CONCERNS THAT LATER ON SOMEBODY MIGHT NOT WANT TO USE THE REST OF THE PARKING LOT FOR SOMETHING ELSE. WELL IF YOU DID A RECTANGLE LIKE THAT WE INCLUDE THE BUILDING AND EVERYTHING TOO. I'M JUST TELLING YOU THAT RIGHT NOW. YOU KNOW THE RECTANGLE WOULD INCLUDE THE BUILDING INSIDE OF THAT RECTANGLE. >> WHY WOULD KNOW WHY WHY DO WE HAVE SOLAR PANELS ON TOP OF THAT? SO SO FIRST OFF THAT'S ACTUALLY NOT BEEN THE CONCERN. IT'S NOT THE MEETS AND BOUNDS I KNOW THE MEETS AND BOUNDS OF THE CONCERN RIGHT NOW SO WE'RE TRYING TO DO THE BEST WE CAN TO GET IT AS FAST AS WE CAN. BUT THE CONCERN THAT WE HAD FOR THE PARKS DEPARTMENT AND ON THE ADVISORY BOARD WAS THAT WHEN WE FIRST STARTED THIS THEY WERE TOLD AND I WAS TOLD IT WAS ABOUT AIR RIGHTS AND THAT THEY WERE TOTALLY AGAINST ALIENATION . OKAY. SO NOW WE FLIPPED IT. OKAY? AND SO THAT THEY PASSED A RESOLUTION AT THE ADVISORY BOARD LEVEL TO NOT MOVE FORWARD. IT WAS JUST ALIENATION. ROGER BURKHART AND I HAVE BEEN ON BACK AND FORTH WITH EMAILS AND I DO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT PERRY'S TALKING ABOUT ABOUT THE REVERTING CLAUSE THAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT. AND SO I LOOKED AT IT VERY CLOSELY PERSONALLY I WAS GOING TO TALK TO JOE ABOUT WHETHER HE THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO SUBSTANTIALLY HOLD UP MY CONCERN AND SO IS THE BOARD'S CONCERN IS NOT ABOUT THIS BOARD BUT ABOUT A FUTURE BOARD. COULD THEY MAKE A CHANGE WITHIN THAT CLAUSE TO BE ABLE TO DO SOMETHING ELSE WITH THE LAND? >> BECAUSE IN MANY WAYS I ALWAYS FEEL LIKE AS COMMISSIONER I'M STEWARD OF THE LAND TO AND I'M PROTECTOR OF THE LAND SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE THAT PROBLEM. BUT I WILL TELL YOU THIS I DID I LOOKED VERY CLOSELY AT THIS AND I EVEN DID WHAT YOU KNOW, MOST PEOPLE PROBABLY SAY IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA. I SENT IT THROUGH FOR DIFFERENT EYES TO TRY AND CRACK THE CODE. >> I ASK IT TO BREAK DOWN THIS AND SOMEHOW TO BE ABLE TO DO WHAT I DIDN'T WANT IT TO DO AND I COULDN'T. AND SO I FEEL VERY CONFIDENT NOW ABOUT ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION NOW WE'RE MEETING AS A BOARD TOMORROW NIGHT THE ADVISORY BOARD AND I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO TAKE IT BACK TO THEM. YES. SO THAT THEY COULD UNDERSTAND WHAT I UNDERSTAND NOW AND MAYBE MAKE A DIFFERENT DECISION. OKAY. THAT'S GOOD CONNECTIONS DIALING BACK IN PERRY LIKES THE CONNECTION THAT HE'S NOT BACKING. I THINK THAT'S A GREAT A GREAT IDEA FOR YOU TO DO THAT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THEY REALLY UM MAYBE UNDERSTAND COMPLETELY WHAT WHAT THE RAMIFICATIONS OF ALIENATION ARE. THIS CHANGES THE REVERTER CLAUSE CHANGES A LOT. >> IT DOES AND YOU KNOW THE THING ABOUT IT IS WHEN THE STATE PASSED THIS LEGISLATION IT WAS BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T TRUST LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO DO THE RIGHT THING. >> THEY THEY DIDN'T WANT THEM TO SELL THE LAND QUICKLY OR TO USE IT FOR ANOTHER USE. THEY WANTED IT TO REMAIN PARKLAND FOR SOME SHORT TERM USE YOU MIGHT NEED A COUPLE OF BUCKS AND SELL IT AND SO THAT'S THE REASON THEY DID IT. SO WHENEVER YOU TALK ABOUT ALIENATION IT KIND OF MAKES THE HAIRS ON THE BACK OF PARKS AND REC PEOPLE STAND UP A LITTLE BIT AND I JUST THINK IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT THAT I LOOKED INTO IT VERY HARD AND I FEEL PRETTY COMFORTABLE THAT THIS LANGUAGE IS GOING TO PROTECT THE LAND SO THAT YOU KNOW, IT'S IMPORTANT NOW BACK TO THE MEETS AND BOUNDS SO WE DID HAVE A SURVEY DONE WHETHER OR NOT THAT JASON CAN PULL THE MEETS AND BOUNDS OFF THAT REALLY QUICKLY. I'LL FIND OUT TOMORROW BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO SEND ME THE CAD FILE AND WE'RE GOING TO SEE IF THAT CAN BE DONE. YOU KNOW, WITHOUT HAVING TO GO BACK OUT AND HIRE A SURVEY IF IT'S NOT I SET IT RIGHT DOWN THERE BUT IT COULD BE A POLYGON JUST SO THAT YOU DON'T HAVE THE BUILDING IN THERE AS WELL. SO IT'S JUST LIMITING THE AREA RIGHT WHERE WE'RE ALIENATING TIGHTEST REASONABLE POLYGON. >> RIGHT, RIGHT, RIGHT. YEAH. I WOULDN'T EXPECT IT TO FIT AS YOU SEE UP ON THE SCREEN BECAUSE IT'S A ZERO CODE AS YOU [00:25:06] SEE UP ON THE SCREEN. I WOULDN'T EXPECT THEM TO PUT ME IN BOUNDS EXACTLY TO THAT BECAUSE WHEN THEY GET OUT AND THEY DO CONSTRUCTION IT MAY END UP HAVING TO BE THIS WAY OR THAT WAY UP AND DOWN. IT WOULD PROBABLY BE BIGGER THAN THAT. >> BUT THAT I'M HOPING THAT WE WILL GET SOMEWHERE TOMORROW. >> IT IS PROBABLY THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. >> YES. THAT'S NEXT ITEM. OKAY. SORRY ABOUT THAT. CAN I JUST ASK A QUESTION? SORRY ABOUT THAT. I SEEM TO RECALL THAT WE CAN GET THE TEMPORARY ALIENATION FROM THE AREA THAT WOULD BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SO THAT YOU CAN MAYBE DEFINE IT. BUT IF YOU CAN VERIFY THAT, I THINK THAT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE. AND I THINK THE LEFT IN TERMS OF IT SOUNDS SERIOUSLY I MEAN PERRY COULD ADDRESS THAT BUT THAT PROBABLY IS GOING TO CAUSE MORE DEBATE ABOUT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT JUST RIGHT. >> PERRY YOUNG BACK I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT. I LOST TRACK OF WHAT WAS THE QUESTION THERE BEFORE THE QUESTION YOU DIDN'T GET TO HEAR WHAT COMMISSIONER LUCCHESE SAID ABOUT THE REVERTER CLAUSE MAKING HIM FEEL MUCH MORE COMFORTABLE ABOUT MOVING FORWARD AND THAT HE HAS TO GO BACK TO HIS ADVISORY BOARD. >> YEAH, PERRY, I DID I DID READ THROUGH THE THE REVERTER CLAUSE AND SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT EVEN ROGER HAD SENT TO YOU AND IT DOES MAKE ME FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE ABOUT THE FACT THAT YOU KNOW, THE LAND WOULD BE PROTECTED AND THAT WOULD REALLY BE A SINGLE USE AND THAT THIS BOARD AND FUTURE BOARDS WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ACTUALLY MAKE A CHANGE TO THAT CLAUSE. >> SO I'M MEETING WITH THE ADVISORY BOARD TOMORROW NIGHT AND I WILL TALK TO THEM ABOUT THAT AND FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE ABOUT WHAT THIS YOU KNOW WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY AND AS FAR AS THE SURVEY WE DO, I THINK WE HAVE A SURVEY AND I'M GOING TO GIVE IT TO OUR TOWN ENGINEER AND HE'S GOING TO LOOK AT IT TOMORROW AND SEE IF HE CAN COME UP WITH MEETS AND BOUNDS. >> GREAT. THAT'S GREAT. GOOD. SOMEONE SHARE THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THE PROPOSED BILL WITH ME BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN IT IN A FEW DAYS AND I JUST YEAH I JUST PUT IT IN THE CHAT BOX. I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN. I WANT IF I'D RATHER LOOK AT IT AFTER THE FACT. IF YOU COULD JUST EMAIL IT TO ME PLEASE. AND I ALSO HAVE A QUESTION IS IT CORRECT THAT THERE'S ALSO A PROPOSED BILL THAT ALIENATION WOULD NO LONGER BE NEEDED FOR SOLAR PANELS IN PARKLAND AND IF SO, WHERE ARE WE WITH THAT LAW? I MEAN WOULD IT BE HELPFUL TO GET A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM THE TOWN BOARD FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT BECAUSE THAT AIN'T HAPPENED IN THIS YEAR. THAT BILL IS COMING IN THE SENATE. IT'S A P HARKIN BILL. THEY TRADITIONALLY PASS IT IN THE SENATE AND IT'S GONE NOWHERE IN THE ASSEMBLY. SO THAT MIGHT HAPPEN SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE. >> THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN IN BEFORE JUNE 4TH. OKAY. BEST CASE SCENARIO THAT DOES HAPPEN EVENTUALLY AND THEN I THINK THE MOVE WOULD BE TO REALIGN IT AND BRING IT BACK TO PARKLAND. >> REVERTED TO PARKLAND, RIGHT? OKAY. YEAH. >> BUT WHAT THE WHAT I WROTE IN ADDITION TO THE MEETS AND BOUNDS IS IS THE RESOLUTION I HAVE FROM JANUARY JUST TALKS ABOUT SOLAR GENERALLY AND BOTH CHAMBERS HAVE SAID THEY'RE GOING TO NEED A NEW TOWN RESOLUTION SPECIFIC TO ANTHONY VETERAN PARK SAYING ALIENATION THERE SO WE WILL NEED ANOTHER RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION TO BE SPECIFIC TO WELL THE HOME RULE REQUEST WILL COME AFTER WE NEED TWO THINGS. ONE IS THE RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION. BUT THAT'S JUST A FORMALITY BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO GET INTRODUCED WITH THE AND BOUND AND THEN ONCE I HAD THE BILL NUMBERS THEN THEN THAT'S THE HOME RULE REQUEST WHICH WILL CITE THE ACTUAL BILL NUMBERS WHICH I CAN'T GET UNTIL I HAVE THE MEETING. >> THAT'S OKAY. SO THEN WE NEED A RESOLUTION FOR NEXT WEEK. OKAY? >> RIGHT. BUT THE RESOLUTION DOESN'T NEED TO SAY A MEETING RIGHT. >> OKAY. THAT'S GREAT. EXCELLENT. THERE JUST ONE OTHER THING ASIDE FROM THE ALIENATION CONSIDERATION IS I'M SORRY, PERRY, DID YOU SAY THE RESOLUTION NEEDS TO SAY IT MEETS ABOUT DOES NOT I ASKED THAT QUESTION AND THEY SAID WITH REASONABLE CERTAINTY THAT DOESN'T MEET THE MEETS AND BOUNDS. IT JUST NEEDS TO IDENTIFY WE ALIENATE THEM AND DIDN'T HAVE THE ALIENATION JUST NEEDS SAY INSTALLATION OF SOLAR AND ANTHONY VETERANS PARK AND THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH IT JUST WHAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW IS GENERIC SOLAR INSTALLED TOWN PARKS THAT'S TWO TOO GENERIC THAT'S GOOD SO IT GIVES US A LITTLE EXTRA TIME IF WE NEED IT. >> WELL NOT REALLY. YOU KNOW THE CLOCK IS TICKING. >> DOES THEY HAVE THE RESOLUTION? >> IT'S JUST ONE MORE THING WE HAVE TO DO. NO, I'M TALKING ABOUT THE MIX AND BALANCE. IF WE DON'T HAVE A NEED TO BALANCE TOMORROW, WE WE'RE GOING TO BE LASER. >> WE'RE GOING TO GET THEM. SO IT'S POSSIBLE. YEAH. DON'T NEED THE METES AND BOUNDS FOR THIS RESOLUTION NEED THE MINUTES AND BOUNCE TO GET THE BILL INTRODUCED OKAY WE'RE JUST IN 2017. >> IMPORTANT PRACTICAL CONSIDERATION VERY IMPORTANT I BELIEVE SO COMMISSIONER LUCCHESE HAS BEEN WORKING ON A VERY PROACTIVE AND GOOD SCHEME FOR THE PARKING LOT LONG TERM AS YOU KNOW IT SLOPES DOWN IN [00:30:03] SEVERAL LOCATIONS. SO I KNOW YOU'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THIS DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE PARKS AND REC BOARD AND HAVE THE CONCEPT FLESHED OUT FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF THAT PARKING LOT. WHAT'S VERY IMPORTANT IN MY MIND IS THAT THAT DESIGN REALLY RAMP UP BECAUSE ULTIMATELY THERE'S GOING TO BE SIGNIFICANT GREAT UPDATES TO ACHIEVE ADA COMPLIANT SEE BOTH FOR PEDESTRIANS AFTER THEY PARK AND AS THEY ARE IN THE PARKING LOT RECALL LIKE SHOPRITE FOR INSTANCE THAT PARKING LOT WHEN IT WAS A MOVIE THEATER WAS LIKE THIS WHAT THEY DID THERE WAS A MASSIVE FILL IN THE FRONT AND THEY BROUGHT IT LEVEL WITH THE FRONT OF THE NEW SPACE SO THE REASON I MENTION THE URGENCY HERE IS THAT IF WE HAD THE LEGISLATION PASSED TOMORROW AND THE SOLAR PROVIDER WAS READY TO START WORKING TOMORROW OR THE DAY AFTER THAT, THEY CAN'T WORK OFF THE CURRENT GRADES. SO THESE TWO PROJECTS ARE REALLY INTERTWINED. THERE'S A POSSIBILITY THAT THE SITE WORK CAN BE LINKED UP. IT COULD EVEN BE BETTER TERMS PERHAPS ON THE SOLAR IF THAT SITE WORK IS IS IS ESSENTIALLY LAID UP FOR THE SOLAR PROVIDER. SO THERE COULD BE SOME SYNERGY THERE. BUT THE SOLAR PROJECT REALLY CAN'T RUN ON ITS OWN PACE EVEN WITH EVERYTHING THAT PERRY'S HELPING US OUT THAT THE TOWN BOARD SUPPORTING WITHOUT THE PARKING LOT REALLY ALMOST LIKE FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND A PLAN TO REALLY ACHIEVE THOSE FINAL GRADES AND ADA COMPLIANCE I DID TALK TO COMMISSIONER MORENO ABOUT THE FACT IF WE DID ACTUALLY GET THE CANOPIES UP COULD WE STILL PAVE UNDERNEATH IT? AND HE SAID YES BUT OBVIOUSLY IT WOULD BE EASIER IF WE DID IT SIMULTANEOUSLY OR YOU KNOW, TOGETHER EVEN IF WE JUST PUT THE POSTING BEFOREHAND AND FLY THE CANOPIES LATER. >> BUT BUT THE PAVING IS ONE THING THAT THE SIGNIFICANT REGRADE THAT I WILL BELIEVE IS GOING TO BE NECESSARY HERE THAT HAS TO HAPPEN FIRST YOU HAVE TO GET THE CONDUIT IN THE GROUND AND THE CONTENT IN THE GROUND AND THAT CAN'T BE PUT ON THE SOLAR CONTRACTOR RIGHT AND WE AND NO. TWO RIGHT. THAT'S ALL THAT'S GREAT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. >> EXCELLENT. THANK YOU, GEORGE. THANKS. SO YOU GUYS WILL WORK ON THE RESO YES. >> THAT NEXT STEP. ALL RIGHT, GREAT. A CAN I JUST ASK YOU WHILE YOU'RE HERE, PERRY, I JUST WANT TO ASK. YEAH. YOU KNOW, I STILL HAVEN'T GOTTEN LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS RELATING TO THE SPEED THE SPEED CAMERAS . YEAH. I'VE BEEN REACHING OUT TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS. UM, YOU KNOW YOU KNOW, I'M I TRIED AGAIN. YOU KNOW, TODAY YOU KNOW, I'LL KEEP I'LL KEEP TRYING. YOU KNOW, I JUST I KNOW THAT RESIDENTS BASICALLY ARE VERY SUPPORTIVE BECAUSE IT'S FOR PROTECTION SAFETY AND I'M WONDERING WHAT THE CHANCES ARE OF GETTING THE LEGISLATION I'LL KEEP YOU KNOW TO ME LIKE ON HILLSIDE AVENUE UM YOU KNOW WHAT THE BAILEY SCHOOL I MEAN THERE'S A LOT OF KIDS WHO WALK AND IT'S DANGEROUS AND IF WE HAVE THE SPEED CAMERAS WE'D BE SAY SAFER WETLANDS THE SAME THING. I'M JUST SORT OF WONDERING WHAT WE COULD DO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THE AUTHORIZATION TO HAVE A PILOT SPEED CAMERA INITIATIVE. >> BUT I THINK THEY'RE WILLING TO DO IT. SO ASSEMBLYWOMAN CHOMSKY AND SENATOR STEWART-COUSINS HAVE SAID THAT THEY ARE COMFORTABLE MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT AFTER THE INSTALLATION OF RED LIGHT CAMERAS. SO I'M CONFIDENT WE CAN GET THE BILL INTRODUCED AND WE HAVE LESS OF A DEADLINE THERE BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH THE LEGISLATURE IS RECESSING ON THE FOURTH, YOU CAN STILL GET BILLS INTRODUCED. STAFF IS WORKING SO WE CAN GET A BILL INTRODUCTION IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE TO BE UNTIL WE HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF RED LIGHT CAMERA. THAT'S WHY IT'S GOING TO BE BOTH OFFICES OF EXPRESS WHEN IS HANG ON ONE SECOND WHEN IS IT GOING TO BE WHATEVER IT IS I THINK I THINK THE LAST I SPOKE TO THE POLICE CHIEF WAS SOMETIME IN JUNE. YEAH. HAVE YOU REACHED OUT TO HIM AGAIN? I I HAVE REACHED OUT BUT YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T GOT I ASKED I HAVEN'T GOTTEN CONFIRMATION TODAY. UM, IT DOESN'T SAY YOU WE WANT TO SEE IF WE COULD GET THE CHIEF ON THE LINE THE TEXT WITH HIM. >> DID I ASK THAT QUESTION? SORRY. >> WE HAVE CONTRACTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND THE OTHER QUESTION AND THE OTHER THE OTHER COMMENT THERE IS BOTH OFFICERS HAVE SAID THEY NEED TO SEE WHAT THE INTERSECTIONS ARE AND THEN A SUPPORT LETTER AS THE SUPERVISOR SAID FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD. BUT I HAD BROUGHT OUT IF TWO OF THOSE SECTIONS ARE NOT INTERSECTIONS, IF TWO OF THOSE STREETS ARE STATE ROADS, THAT'S NOT TO SAY WE CAN'T DO IT. IT'S JUST IT WILL TAKE LONGER TO IMPLEMENT BECAUSE STATE ROADS REQUIRE A PERMITTING PROCESS THROUGH NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. SO MY COMMENT TO THE BOARD WAS THAT'S GOING TO TAKE LONGER. SO IF YOU WANT TO GET THE PROGRAM OUT OF THE GATE QUICKER YOU'D WANT TO CHOOSE TOWN ROAD. SO NOT TO SAY WE WOULDN'T GET AUTHORIZATION IT'S JUST THAT THE ROADS THAT ARE STATE OWNED IT'S GOING TO TAKE LONGER TO GET THE PERMITTING FROM D.O.T. CAN TAKE LONGER TO GET THOSE SCHOOL ZONES SPEED CAMERAS UP ON THOSE ROADS. I JUST WANT TO SUBSTITUTE THE TWO STATE ROAD WE HAVE RIGHT NOW IS A QUESTION BECAUSE YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE THOUGHTS I HAD [00:35:06] IS EVERYBODY FEELS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE IT SAFER FOR KIDS TO GO TO SCHOOL AND EVERYBODY'S CONCERNED ABOUT SPEEDING, YOU KNOW, NEAR NEAR SCHOOLS. WHY CAN'T WE BE WHAT IF WE DRAFTED LIKE LEGISLATION BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE SESSION SAYING THAT UM, THE TOWN BOARD WOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PLACE THE TOWN WOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PLACE A MAXIMUM OF SAY THREE SPEED CAMERAS ON THEIR SCHOOL AND YOU COULD COME UP WITH THE PROVIDED THE SCHOOL DISTRICT THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS A RESOLUTION SAYING THAT THEIR SUPPORTIVE OF IT SO BECAUSE I COULD SEE OTHER SCHOOLS THAT YOU KNOW WHERE PEOPLE HAVE COMPLAINED TO ME ABOUT SPEEDING THAT ARE NOT ON THIS LIST AND THIS WOULD GIVE US A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY IF WE'RE DEALING WITH I MEAN HILLSIDE WOULD BE PERFECT BUT IF THE STATE D.O.T. ISN'T GOING TO GIVE US PERMISSION TO DO IT OR THEY DELAY IT, THEN WE MIGHT AS WELL PUT IT SOMEPLACE ELSE. IT COULD BE LEE JACKSON, IT COULD BE ON YOU KNOW IT COULD BE THE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL YOU KNOW IF SOMEBODY SUGGESTED IT IS NEAR AN EDGE MINE HIGH SCHOOL ON EDGE MINE ROAD NEAR NEAR THE POND THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER LOCATION. THAT WOULD BE YEAH, THAT WOULD BE GREAT BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR THE SPEED. >> UM OKAY. BUT WE KNOW WE CAN'T DO THE SPEED CAMERAS TILL THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS ARE MAYBE THE STATE MAYBE IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN THIS SESSION. MAYBE WE COULD HAVE THIS BECAUSE I, I SORT OF FEEL THAT UM, PUBLIC THERE'S NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT TO ANY ELECTED OFFICIAL THAN SAFETY AND THERE'S YOU KNOW, THERE'S TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO GET KILLED OR INJURED BECAUSE ACROSS THE STREET AND ON AND A CAR RUNS THEM OVER OR OR HITS THEM AND THEN THEY GET INJURED. SO I SORT OF FEEL IF WE MADE AN EFFORT AND ASKED ALBANY TO GIVE US PERMISSION TO HAVE YOU KNOW, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GIVE US PERMISSION TO DO ANYTHING UNTIL WE DO THEY CAN'T TOUCH THIS. >> WE HAVE TO FINISH ONE STEP BEFORE GOING TO THE NEXT ONE. >> SO THE STEP WE HAVE TO FINISH IS THE INSTALLATION OF THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS AND I'M LOOKING BACK AT EMAILS. IT SAYS ONE CAMERA CAN BE STOLEN OR ZEROED AND YOU START STILL AVENUE I MEAN I JUST RIGHT THOSE ARE THE TWO LOCATIONS ARE OR DO WE KNOW WE HAD WE SHOULD HAVE IN MY TOWN ROADS RATHER THAN ON STATE ROADS WHEN WE THIS IS WHAT'S FRUSTRATING YOU KNOW WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT EVERY CHILD AND NOBODY GETTING KILLED. WE ASKED OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT I RAISED THIS EARLIER NOT MONTHS AND MONTHS AND MONTHS AGO HOW DID WE PICK THESE INTERSECTIONS, THESE TWO INTERSECTIONS AND WE WERE TOLD AND UNEQUIVOCAL TERMS WE PICKED THEM BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE MOST NEEDED BECAUSE PEOPLE SPEED PAST THOSE TWO INTERSECTIONS. NOW YOU'RE SAYING WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT EVERY CHILD BUT YOU KNOW, IF D.O.T. DELAYS US A LITTLE BIT, LET'S GO SOMEPLACE ELSE THAN WHAT OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT IS SAYING. WHERE IS THAT? THEY'RE REALLY NEEDED AND THAT'S WHY THEY CAME UP TO THE STATE D.O.T.. I THINK WE HAVE THOSE PEOPLE IN THE STATE THAT CAN TAKE WHATEVER WE COULD GET BECAUSE BASICALLY WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR IS A PILOT PROGRAM. WE'RE SHOWING THAT THE SPEED CAMERAS COULD WORK AND UM, AFTER THE FIRST YEAR THEN I HOPE WE HAVEN'T SHOWED THE RED LIGHT. >> CAMERAS ARE INSTALLED YET. THEY KEPT TELLING US TO TWO ISSUES HERE SO THEY CAN'T PUT THE LIKE YOU KNOW ONE THAT THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS HAVE TO BE INSTALLED FIRST AND NOT CONTINUE TO PLACED UPON THIS BY THE STATE AND THE IT IS THE ISSUE IS SURE THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS ON STATE INTERSECTIONS THAT HAVE STATE CONTROLLED ROADS SO YOU KNOW BOTH BOTH OF THEM ARE THINGS THAT WILL TAKE TIME AND THAT THAT CAN'T BE DONE IN ADVANCE OF THIS SESSION AND THAT I CAN PERCEIVE AND THAT'S WHAT I'M HEARING CORRECT FOR THE STATE AND I CAN DO THIS. YEAH. YES I THINK YEAH LOOK THE PROBLEM IS THE CLOCK'S RUNNING AND I THINK THE SUPERVISOR ACTUALLY HAS AN INTERESTING SUGGESTION. THE PROBLEM IS WE JUST DON'T HAVE TIME TO DO THAT BETWEEN NOW AND JUNE 4TH. AND WHAT I'M GOING TO HEAR FROM THE LEGISLATURE IS OKAY, YOU REALLY NEED TO PICK ONE OF THESE ISSUES IF YOU WANT THAT ACROSS THE FINISH LINE BY THE FOURTH. THAT'S THE ISSUE. WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF TIME. IT'S NO ONE'S FAULT HERE. THE BUDGET IS RUNNING WAY AND AS I SIT HERE WE STILL DON'T HAVE A STATE BUDGET. IT'S CROWDING OUT CONSIDERATION OF EVERYTHING ELSE BUDGET PASSES NEXT WEEK. WE LITERALLY HAVE LIKE THREE WEEKS TO GET THIS DONE. SO YOU KNOW WHAT I WOULD URGE YOU TO DO IS PRIORITIZE WHICH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AND I ALSO KNOW YOU HAVE THAT ISSUE WITH THE TAX CREDIT FOR THE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS. WE REALLY NEED TO DECIDE WHAT WE WANT ACROSS THE FINISH LINE BY JUNE 4TH. THE OTHERS WE ABSOLUTELY CAN CONTINUE WORKING ON WE CAN GET A BILL INTRODUCTION ON SCHOOLS ON SPEED. [00:40:03] WE COULD TRY TO GET MORE GENERIC LANGUAGE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE SCHOOL BOARDS ACTUALLY NOT BAD IDEA BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT AND GET THAT BILL PASSED BY JUNE 4TH. THAT NEGOTIATION WILL EAT UP TOO MUCH TIME. THE ALIENATION BILL DIFFERENT STORY. WE'VE ALREADY GOT PEOPLE ON BOARD. IT'S REALLY JUST PLUGGING IN THE MEETS AND BOUNDS SO I THINK WE JUST HAVE TO AT THIS AT THIS LATE STAGE YOU KNOW IN THE SESSION WITH THE BUDGET RUNNING LATE PICK WHICH ONE WE WANT WHICH WE WANT PASSED BY JUNE 4TH BUT THAT REALLY NEED I THOUGHT THE RED LIGHT CAMERA WAS ALREADY PASSED I THOUGHT THAT'S WHAT WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR INSTALLATION INSTALLATION. I'M TALKING ABOUT THINGS THAT ARE NOT PASSED YET LIKE THE STREET CAMERAS OR DOES THE CHIEF HAVE ANY RESPONSE ABOUT THE INSTALLATION OF THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS? OKAY. SO YEAH. AND DO WE HAVE THOSE THOSE LOCATIONS ARE WE CONFIRMING OR NOT? WELL, THE LOCATIONS THE LOCATIONS I WOULD CONFIRM IT'S ARE THEY AT MY OLD MOMMY RIGHT. >> IS HARTSVILLE AT ROCKINGHAM SO THOSE ARE THE RED LIGHT THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS AND ARE THOSE THOSE ARE BOTH TOWN SO THERE SHOULD BE NO DELAY THEN REASON FOR ASKING FOR OKAY SO IT'S ONE STEP AT A TIME TO GET STUFF DONE LET'S MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THIS SO WE ONLY DELAY IS GETTING THEM INSTALLED AND WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHY THAT'S HAPPENING. YES, BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN TALKING BACK AND FORTH WITH THE VENDOR BUT I KNOW THINGS ARE MOVING. OH GREAT. SO I KNOW THAT YEAH. >> AND AND ALIENATION I WOULD SAY YOU KNOW EVERY DAY THAT'S TICKING BY NOW WITHOUT THE BILL INTRO IS STARTING TO CUT IT VERY CLOSE SO WE WOULD REALLY NEED WE REALLY NEED BUILD NUMBERS WITHIN THE NEXT LIKE YOU KNOW 5 OR 6 DAYS TO EVEN FOR THAT BILL TO BE ABLE TO GET IT IN POSITION TO PASS BY JUNE 4TH I THINK WE NEED TO AUTHORIZE THAT MEANS SOME BOUNDS BE BE CREATED WE COULD RATIFY IT NEXT WEDNESDAY AT OUR TOWN BOARD MEETING BUT WE NEED TO GET MOVING ON THE WORK ON HAVING THOSE MEET AND BOUNDS CREATED PARAGRAPH OVER THAT'S RIGHT AND THEN WHAT I CAN DO IS I COULD COMMUNICATE TO SENATOR STEWART COUSIN AND ASSEMBLYWOMAN MRS. OFFICES THAT THERE IT IS A GO. WE'RE GOING TO BE GETTING THE ALIENATION OF THE OF THE PARKING LOTS TO MEET AND BOUNDS ARE COMING AND AT LEAST THEY'LL KNOW THAT THE TOWN IS HAVE MADE A DECISION TO PROCEED WITH THE DRAFT AS WE CONTEMPLATE AND THAT WILL HELP BECAUSE THEY COULD AT LEAST YOU KNOW MAYBE GIVE AN ALERT THAT THIS IS A PRIORITY BILL, WE'RE STILL WORKING ON THE DRAFT AND YOU KNOW, AS SOON AS IT COMES THEY'RE GOING TO GO INTO LEADERSHIP IN BOTH HOUSES AND SAY THIS IS CRITICAL FOR THE GRAMMAR. >> THANK YOU. AND WE ALSO NEED THE FIREFIGHTER BILL REGARDING THE PEOPLE THAT TOW RIGHT. >> RIGHT. AND I JUST HAVE TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH JOE. I JUST NEED TO CLEAR UP SOME QUESTIONS I HAD ABOUT THE VEHICLE. >> WOULD YOU SAY THAT ALSO AND ALSO THE ARDSLEY SICK OR AMBULANCE CORPS? RIGHT. WOULD YOU SAY THAT IF THAT'S A PRIORITY DO YOU THINK THAT'S A GOOD SHOT AT GETTING THAT APPROVED? >> OKAY. DO WE FIRE AND AMBULANCE? I WOULD SAY AT THIS POINT ONE OF THEM WE HAVE TO PICK I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH RUNWAY LEFT TO GET TO BILL'S DONE BY THE FOURTH. I THINK UNFORTUNATELY BECAUSE OF SESSION THIS YEAR AND HOW THE BUDGET IS CROWDED OUT SO MUCH THAT OUR BEST SHOT IS ONE. >> HOWEVER, IN TERMS OF THE AMBULANCE SCORE WE DID ASK FOR A RETROACTIVE POTENTIALLY EXEMPT SO IT IS POSSIBLE IF THAT ONE IS PASSED NEXT YEAR AS OPPOSED TO THIS YEAR IT WOULD STILL APPLY AND THOSE PEOPLE WOULD BE MADE WHOLE AFTER EFFECT POTENTIALLY, YES. >> RIGHT. RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. >> THAT'S IT. OKAY. THAT'S GOOD. THAT WASN'T ENOUGH. >> I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT IT SEEMED TO GO SMOOTHLY. THAT'S A GOOD I THINK. THANKS, EVERYONE. YES, WELL GOOD TEAM EFFORT. >> RIGHT? OKAY. OKAY. MAYA, AM I OKAY? YEAH. YES. THANK YOU. >> YOU LOOK GREAT, GUYS. THANK YOU. I CAN'T. >> THANKS VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. BYE. REVIEW OF ICE RESOLUTION. >> NO. OH, IF YOU PLEASE. DO YOU SEE THE TRAFFIC? YES. EVERYBODY ELSE. EVERYONE SET AND READY TO GO? YEAH. OKAY. SO THANKS FOR THE TIME HERE. WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST HARTSDALE AVENUE AND LEWIS AVENUE WHERE THERE'S A SIGNAL THIS IS NOT A NEW PRESENTATION BUT WE WILL HAVE OUR CONSULTANTS REFRESH THE BOARD AND TALKING ABOUT AN IMPROVEMENT THAT THE TOWN SEEKS TO MAKE AT THIS TIME JOINED WITH US ON VIDEO CONFERENCE ARE THE TOWN'S ENGINEERING CONSULTANT FROM BARTON AND LAJEUNESSE. THAT'S TOM BAIRD AS WELL AS PETE CHRISTIANO HAPPY AND THEN WE HAVE ELAINE DO ALSO A P FROM AK F AND THEY'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THIS INTERSECTION AND JUST RECAP A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE EAST HARTSDALE AVENUE TAP GROUP AND THEN WE'LL FIELD YOUR QUESTIONS. [00:45:01] OKAY. THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT WE'VE HEARD BEFORE. IT'S JUST NOW THAT WE'RE AT THE IMPLEMENTATION STAGE CORRECT? YES, IT'S A RECAP OF WHAT WE'VE HEARD BEFORE BUT THERE'S A TARGETED IMPROVEMENT THAT WE WANT TO SEEK YOUR SUPPORT ON TO TO IMPLEMENT ACTUALLY AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. GARRETT THIS IS TOM BERRY. CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, THANK YOU. NO, THANKS FOR HAVING US JOIN YOU TONIGHT. AND WE HAVE A SHORT PRESENTATION PETER CHRISTIANO AND ELAINE DO WE'RE GOING TO RUN THROUGH A QUICK POWERPOINT JUST TO KIND OF REFRESH EVERYONE AND GIVE SOME VISUALS AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE WITH THE LOCATION AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE GONE OVER AND DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO THE SCREEN AND I'LL HAVE PETE AND ELAINE START RIGHT UP WITH THIS QUICK POWERPOINT. PERFECT. THANKS, TOM. SO LIKE TOM SAID AND GARY AS WELL, THIS WAS A PRESENTATION THAT WE PROVIDED A FEW YEARS AGO AND WE'VE KIND OF PARED IT DOWN. WE DON'T NEED TO GO THROUGH ALL THAT BUT JUST KIND OF RECAP FOR EVERYONE WHAT THE PROJECT INVOLVES, WHAT THE OBJECTIVES ARE. BASICALLY WE'RE TRYING TO TRANSFORM THAT EXISTING VEHICLE CENTRIC CORRIDOR TO BE MORE CONDUCIVE FOR PEDESTRIANS, PROVIDE QUALITY OF LIFE BENEFITS FOR PEOPLE THAT WALK ALSO PEOPLE THAT DRIVE THEIR VEHICLE THROUGH THE CORRIDOR AND PROVIDED AN ALTERNATIVE TO THOSE VEHICLE TRIPS ALL THAT WITH THE GOAL OF ENHANCING SAFETY ENHANCING TRAFFIC FLOW. SO WHAT OUR PROJECT LIMITS AQUEDUCT ROAD TO FOUR CORNERS FOUR CORNERS THE CAPONERA ROAD SO EAST HARTSDALE AVENUE IS THAT AQUEDUCT THE FOUR CORNERS COMPONENT. SO WHAT ARE WE DOING IN THAT AREA CORRECTING SIDEWALK DEFICIENCIES SO CURB BRAND SIGNAGE PAYMENTS PRICING ALL THAT IS JUST LITTLE LITTLE MISSING WHAT IT NEEDS TO HAVE RIGHT NOW REDUCING CROSSWALK LANES CURRENTLY THEY MAY BE A LITTLE BIT LONGER THAN THEY NEED TO BE SO HOW CAN WE IMPROVE THAT SHORTENING THE CROSSWALK TO PROVIDE PEOPLE LESS EXPOSURE TIME TO VEHICLES IN ADDITION TO THAT REPLACING EXISTING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SIGNAL INFRASTRUCTURE SO A COMPONENT IN A LAYERED ON TOP OF OUR NEXT IS THE ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM THAT WILL BETTER RESPOND TO THOSE PEAK FLOWS OF TRAFFIC FROM THE TRAIN STATION. SO THAT'S THE EAST HARTSDALE COMPONENT. WEST HARTSDALE IS SOMEWHAT PEOPLE IT'S PROVIDING I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT. >> I THINK YOU'RE SHARING THE WRONG SCREEN NOW THE SLIDES AREN'T ADVANCING. >> P OKAY. I'M SORRY THE IS GOOD. IT'S JUST THE SLIDES SIMPLY WEREN'T ADVANCING OR I'M I'M SHOWING IT ON MY SCREEN UNFORTUNATELY WE SEE PROJECT LIMITS IN SCOPE RIGHT NOW. >> YEAH. SORRY I'M TRYING TO SHOW THAT ON THE MAIN SCREEN BUT THAT IS UNFORTUNATELY THAT'S OKAY. >> WE SEE WE SEE THE PROJECT LIMITS AND SCOPE OF WORK THIS GO WITH THIS FOR NOW. >> SO LIKE I SAID SORRY ABOUT THAT SO WEST HARTSDALE PROVIDING THAT CONTINUOUS 88 COMPLIANT SIDEWALK FROM PARK UPON BACK DOWN TO FOUR CORNERS I'M UNFORTUNATELY ADVANCING THAT YEAH NOW WE SEE THE SIGNAL REALLOCATION GRAPHIC YEAH AND I'VE GOT SOME GRAPHICS IN HERE IT'S KIND OF CONFUSING THE WAY IT'S SHOWN RIGHT NOW FOR US WE SEE SIGNAL SPACING AND TECHNOLOGY THAT WE CAN SEE THAT JUST FINE. >> YEAH I KNOW WHAT I'M TRYING I HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN ANIMATION IN THERE AND BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE CONFUSING THE WAY IT'S GOING RIGHT NOW. >> YEAH STAFF SHARE AND THEN THE SHOW DISPLAY SCREEN WITH THAT I'M JUST SETTING THE DISPLAY SCREEN YOU MIGHT HAVE TOO MANY SCREENS OPEN. YEAH, I'M NOT SURE HOW TO DISPLAY IT SO I DO HAVE THREE SCREENS ON MY END SO I'M TRYING TO FIGURE THAT OUT ALL THE SAME PRESENTATION SOFTWARE IT IS THEN YOU JUST PICK THAT SO YEP SO WE'RE GOOD. >> WE SEE SIGNAL SPACING AND TECHNOLOGY THAT GRAPHIC. >> YEAH I KNOW IT'S STILL I THINK AT THIS POINT YOU JUST GOT TO PROCEED. >> WE CAN SEE THE GRAPHIC DESIGN SORRY DOUBLE LANE MAYBE I'LL HAVE YOU DISCUSS THE, UH THE LEWIS AVENUE SIGNAL HERE. >> ALL RIGHT. WE'RE SORRY FOR THE TECHNOLOGICAL DIFFICULTIES. >> COMPUTERS ALWAYS DON'T ALWAYS WORK WELL FOR US EVEN [00:50:06] THOUGH WE USE THEM EVERY DAY. SO GOING THROUGH WHAT ONE OF THE MOST CRITICAL PARTS OF THIS WE ARE PROPOSING TO THE LEWIS AVENUE PURCHASE CYCLE THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT I SUGGEST YOU ACTUALLY BECAUSE IT'S LOOKING VERY SMALL ON THE SCREEN THAT'S GOING OUT BECAUSE WE'RE SEEING, YOU KNOW, THE PREVIEW ON THE ON THE LEFT AS WELL. COULD YOU EITHER, YOU KNOW, DO FROM THE BEGINNING OR YOU KNOW ,PRESENTATION MODE OR WHATEVER YOU NEED TO DO TO ACTUALLY GO FULL SCREEN GEAR? >> ARE YOU ABLE TO SHARE ON YOUR SCREEN THE VERSION I SENT EARLIER TODAY? >> YEAH. YOU PULL THAT UP AND IN THE INTERIM IF YOU WANT TO JUST KEEP THAT UP AGAIN I'M TRYING TO FIND IT HERE CHANGE A PARAMETER SO I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN IF THAT ARE STILL GREAT. >> YEAH I WORK THAT WAY. LANE SORRY. YES. THE PROBLEM RIGHT. >> OKAY SO GOING BACK TO IT REMOVING THE LEWIS AVENUE PATH TRAFFIC SIGNAL IS VERY CRITICAL TO THIS PROJECT FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS. SO CURRENTLY IF THAT SIGNAL IS NOT IN UTC COMPLIANT IT'S NOT COMPLIANT WITH THAT. SO WE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. THE FEDERAL IS ACTUALLY THE FEDERAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL STANDARDS AS WELL AS STATE STANDARDS AND AS A RESULT IT CREATES A LOT OF CONFUSION TO THE DRIVERS FOR THEIR THERE AND IT'S ALSO NOT SAFE FOR PEDESTRIANS TO CROSS OUR LOCATION SO WITH THAT THAT TRAFFIC SIGNAL ONLY SERVES ONE DIRECTION AND THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY IT'S CAUSING IT ALSO SERVES A VERY SMALL NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT ARE COMING FROM A COMING FROM LEWIS AVENUE ITSELF. IT'S ONLY A HANDFUL OF CARS. SO AGAIN, WE'RE NOT MOVING THOSE TRAFFIC VOLUME CRITERIA THAT YOU NEED TO INSTALL THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. SO AS A RESULT OH I ALSO WANT TO NOTE THAT IT IS VERY CLOSE TO THE COLUMBIA AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. IT'S ONLY ABOUT 300FT AWAY AND TO ALLEVIATE ANY CONCERNS THERE AS WELL IT'S NOT THESE TWO SIGNALS ARE NOT SAFE. SO WHAT SOME FOLKS MAY BELIEVE IS THAT WHEN COLUMBIA TURNS RED LEWIS HAS READ THAT'S NOT THE CASE. AND IF THAT DOES HAPPEN TO GO THAT WAY IT'S MERELY A COINCIDENCE. AND SO FOR VEHICLES WHO ARE ACTUALLY EXITING OUT OF LEWIS AVENUE, IT IS UNSAFE IF TO TRY TO TAKE THAT LEFT TURN ON TO EAST HARTSDALE AVENUE BECAUSE WE STILL HAVE TWO TYPES OF TRAFFIC COMING DOWN AT EASTBOUND OF THIS HARTSDALE AVENUE. SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO AND IF THIS TRAFFIC WILL WORK OUT ALL RIGHT, GO. >> SO OUR PROPOSAL IS WE'RE REMOVING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON LEWIS AVENUE ITSELF AND REALLY CREATING A NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. SO THIS HELPS IN A NUMBER OF WAYS. IT CREATES MORE EASE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL SPACING WHICH ALLOWS US TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC AND IMPROVES FLOW AND IMPROVES OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS . WE'RE ALSO UPGRADING ALL OF THESE TRAFFIC SIGNALS TO MAKE FLOW A LOT EASIER SO YOU'RE NOT THERE HITTING MULTIPLE ROADS AT ONCE AND ESPECIALLY NOT AT LEWIS WHICH AGAIN WAS A NONSTANDARD TRAFFIC CYCLE. SO REMOVING THIS TRAFFIC SIGNAL IS REQUIRED NOT ONLY TO BE COMPLIANT WITH THE FEDERAL AND STATE STANDARDS, IT'S ALSO NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL TRAFFIC OPERATING CONDITIONS AND ALSO VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FOR THE [00:55:07] ENTIRE CORRIDOR IN ADDITION TO SOMETHING MOVING THIS TRAFFIC SIGNAL, WE'RE LOOKING AT UPGRADING ALL OF THESE SIGNALS TO WHAT THE TOWN KNOWS AS SMART SIGNALS SO THAT'S WHAT WE CALL ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS. SO THAT WAY THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS OUT THERE WILL JUST TO LIVE LIVES WITH REAL TIME FLUCTUATIONS IN TRAFFIC AND REALLY IMPROVES THE EFFICIENCY OF THE CORRIDOR FOR FOLKS WHO ARE CONCERNED WITH EXITING ONTO THE EAST HARTSDALE LOT FROM LEWIS AVENUE BECAUSE OF THE WAY THIS SYSTEM WOULD OPERATE THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS WOULD BE SENT AND THEREFORE FOR FOLKS EXITING ONTO THE ASSUMPTION THAT THERE WOULD STILL BE SUFFICIENT GAPS FOR THEM TO MAKE THAT LEFT OR RIGHT TURN AS OPPOSED TO HAVING IT HAVE SIGNALS AND THEN HAVING THE DANGER OF SOMEONE EASTBOUND . I'LL PASS BACK TO PETE TO DISCUSS MORE AS WHAT ELSE IS HAPPENING TO ADVANCE FUNDS. >> PARKER THANK YOU AND COULD YOU EXPLAIN WHEN THAT SYNCHRONIZATION MIGHT HAPPEN? SO ARE YOU TALKING ARE YOU ASKING ABOUT ONE OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES? PARDON? >> RIGHT. YES. PETE I'LL TURN IT TO YOU TO DISCUSS THE SCHEDULE. >> THIS IS GOING TO BE LIKE NEXT YEAR RIGHT? >> YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. YEAH. SO FITTING WE'RE LOOKING AT THE END OF THIS SEASON. THE END OF THIS YEAR AND THEN CONSTRUCTION IN 2027 EXACTLY WHEN THAT IS HAPPENING IS IS A LITTLE UNKNOWN WITH THE D.O.T. REVIEWS AND WHATNOT BUT IT WOULD BE A 2027 CONSTRUCTION AND THAT'S WHEN THOSE SIGNAL EFFORTS WOULD TAKE PLACE. WHAT WE'VE DISCUSSED INTERNALLY AND WITH THE TEAM IS THE BENEFIT OF REMOVING THAT SIGNAL. NOW IN ADVANCE OF THAT PROJECT FOR THE REASONS STATED TONIGHT . >> OKAY. SO THIS SLIDE HERE IS BASICALLY AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OUT THERE RIGHT DOWN THE MID-BLOCK MID-BLOCK CROSSING AT LEWIS YOU CAN SEE WITH THE THE PAVEMENT STRIPING IN THIS GENERAL AREA RIGHT HERE WE'VE GOT A AN EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL THAT A LANE WAS TALKING ABOUT. IT'S IT'S CONTROLLING THIS DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC ONLY SO VEHICLES THAT ARE MOVING IN THIS DIRECTION DO NOT HAVE ANY SIGNAL AND ANY CONTROL STOPPING THEM. THERE ISN'T ANY STOP SIGNS OR SIGNALS FOR THIS APPROACH. AND LEWIS SO YOU CAN SKIP TO THE NEXT SLIDE LANE SO THIS IS JUST AN AREA ON THE GOOGLE STREET VIEW IMAGE LOOKING WEST TOWARDS COLUMBIA AVENUE. YOU CAN SEE THAT EXISTING SIGNAL. SO THERE'S THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT SECTIONS POINTED IN IN THIS DIRECTION CROSSWALKS STRIPING AS LITTLE AS A LITTLE LIGHT RIGHT NOW BUT THAT WOULD BE ENHANCED AS PART OF THE PROJECT CONTINUE TO THE NEXT SLIDE LANE SO THIS IS THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION JUST BASICALLY REITERATING WHAT WHAT I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY YOU'RE LOOKING EAST TOWARDS ROCKLEDGE THERE THERE'S NO SIGNAL INDICATION VEHICLES ARE FREE FLOWING ON THAT SIDE. I'LL HAVE YOU GO ON MORE LANE SO THIS IS A PROPOSED LAYOUT THAT WE HAD WE SHOWED THIS A FEW YEARS AGO. IT'S BASICALLY THE SAME LAYOUT WE HAVE NOW. A COUPLE OF THINGS TO TO KNOW NEW CROSSWALK STRIPING CREATE EACH INTERSECTION APPROACH THERE AND NEW SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS WHO ARE DRIVING THERE YOU TOM MM OKAY SO SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS ON EACH SIDE AS WELL SO DETECTABLE WARNING UNITS THE EXISTING SIGNAL AS WE DISCUSSED WOULD BE REMOVED BUT INSTEAD OF HAVING THAT HERE WE WOULD HAVE NEW PEDESTRIAN SIGNAGE AND I'LL HAVE A LANE SKIP ONE AND SLIDE MORE SO THERE'S A COUPLE DIFFERENT OPTIONS. ONE CAN KIND OF BE THE INTERIM SO THE SIGNAGE HERE IS MORE OF AN ENGINEERING TYPE DRAWING. YOU MAY BE FAMILIAR WITH THESE TYPE OF SIGNS. IT'S IT'S BASICALLY JUST SHOWING THAT WE WOULD HAVE SIGNS ON EACH APPROACH ON BOTH SIDES SO THAT WAY IT DRAWS ATTENTION TO PEDESTRIANS IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA FOR THE MOTORISTS. SO I'LL HAVE YOU SKIP AHEAD ONE MORE LANE YOU'RE PROBABLY FAMILIAR WITH WITH THIS LAYOUT AS WELL. THIS IS KIND OF AN ENHANCED VERSION OF THAT THE STATIC SIGNS IT'S PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON OPERATED SO PEDESTRIANS WOULD WALK UP TO THE CROSSWALK, PUSH THE BUTTON AND THE SIGNS WITH FLASH. SO THIS IS THE RECTANGULAR [01:00:03] RAPID FLASHING BEACON OPTION AND YOU'VE SEEN THIS JUST DOWN THE STREET AT ROCKLEDGE THERE'S AN EXISTING SIGN OF THIS OUT RIGHT THERE RIGHT NOW. THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD PROPOSE IN THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION TO HELP ENHANCE THIS THIS CROSSING . SO WITH THAT THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF IN A NUTSHELL OUR PRESENTATION. BUT WE CAN KIND OF OPEN IT UP TO MORE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS . ONE THING TO NOTE A IT'S IMPORTANT TO REMOVE THE SIGNAL BEFORE THE D.O.T. REVIEWS THE ENTIRE CORRIDOR SYSTEM. THEY WILL FLAG THIS AS A TRAFFIC. IT WILL SLOW US DOWN AND MULTIPLE ADDITIONAL REVIEWS THAT REALLY AREN'T NECESSARY BECAUSE WE ARE TAKING IT OUT BUT IT'S REMOVED PRIOR TO THAT WE CAN STREAMLINE OUR APPROVAL PROCESS AND WITH DOTTIE'S REVIEW EVERY WEEK COUNTS OVER WE CAN SAVE A FEW WEEKS EVEN HERE AND THERE IT REALLY STARTS TO ADD UP AT THE END OF THE PROJECT. SO THAT'S WHY THIS IS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT TO TO DO THIS NOW. >> SO I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THAT IN TERMS OF SAFETY, IF THAT'S REMOVED, HOW FAR IN ADVANCE OF THE LIGHT BEING MOVED TO THE OTHER LOCATION WOULD THAT HAPPEN FOR HOW LONG WOULD THERE BE NO SAFETY FEATURE AT THAT CROSSWALK AND WHAT WOULD THE PROJECT BEING CONSTRUCTED IN 2027? IT WOULD JUST BE A FUNCTION OF ONCE REMOVED AND WITH THE ENHANCED CROSSWALK AND RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS WILL ADD ANOTHER LEVEL OF SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE CROSSWALK. >> YEAH I MEAN MY CONCERNS AS SOMEONE WHO'S ON THAT THAT EXACT INTERSECTION ALL THE TIME BECAUSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION WE'RE DOING ON EAST HARTSDALE AVENUE PLUS YOU KNOW JUST THE NATURE OF OF THE ROAD ITSELF WITH ALL THE TRAFFIC I JUST HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT NOT HAVING ANY WAY FOR PEOPLE TO CROSS SAFELY THERE FOR A CROSSWALK. >> YOU KNOW WE TALK ABOUT RESTRIPING YEAH, THERE MIGHT BE SOME ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE THAT WE CAN PUT IN THE INTERIM. I DON'T THINK THERE WOULD BE AN RFP LIKE A TEMPORARY RFP THAT WILL COME TO THE FULL PROJECT BUT THE CROSSWALK WOULD REMAIN I THINK IT CAN BE MADE MORE VISIBLE A LITTLE BIT EXTRA SIGNAGE. THAT'S WHAT WOULD BE THE CHANCE MAYBE WE COULD TIME IT TO ONE THE RED LIGHT CAMERA IS GOING TO BE UP TO DO THE REMOVAL AND DO THE RED LIGHT CAMERA AT THE SAME TIME BECAUSE IF WE REMOVE A LIGHT THERE'S GOING TO BE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMPLAINING THAT THEY KNOW THAT THERE'S A RED LIGHT CAMERA INSTALLATION HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME WE'RE SHOWING PEOPLE THAT WE'RE ADDRESSING SAFETY AND THEN WE COULD TIME AND BASICALLY REACH OUT TO PEOPLE IN THESE TIMES TILL THEY HAVE ME AND LET THEM KNOW THAT THIS IS LIKE A TEMPORARY ACTION THE REMOVAL OF THE LIGHT. BUT YEAH BUT THAT PARTICULAR PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IS JUST ITS OWN THING. >> IT'S YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? IF PEOPLE KNOW THAT THERE'S A RED LIGHT THERE AND WE'RE ADDRESSING YOU KNOW, ADDRESSING IT THEN THEY'LL THEY'LL KNOW THAT WE'RE TAKING STEPS TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY. WHAT I'M HEARING IS THEY DON'T WANT TO PUT IN THE PLANS TO DEAL WITH THAT LIGHT IN THERE BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO GET FLAGGED AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH EXPLANATIONS AND IT'S GOING TO SLOW IT DOWN SO THEY WOULD LIKE THE LIGHT OUT OR BAGGED AT LEAST INITIALLY, YOU KNOW, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THEY CAN THEN NOT SHOW IT AND SUBMIT THE PLANS TO THE D.O.T.. SO PROCESS WISE WHAT WE WOULD DO YEAH, THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. PROCESS WISE WITH NO OBJECTION FROM THE BOARD WE WOULD SEND LETTERS OUT PROBABLY TOMORROW OR THE NEXT DAY ADVISE RESIDENTS THAT THIS IS WHAT IS PLANNED FOR FOR THIS INTERSECTION AND AS YOU INDICATED DECOMMISSION OR BACK THE METER AS IT ARE. THAT SIGN IS THE FIRST PHASE AND THEN WHEN DPW IS ABLE TO SCHEDULE IT THEY WOULD ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY TAKE DOWN THOSE TWO SIGNALS. >> ALL RIGHT. SO ARE WE SORRY I'M JUST WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THE DECOMMISSIONING OF THE CURRENT LIGHT TRAFFIC LIGHTS, THE TWO LIGHTS THAT ARE ONE DIRECTIONAL THAT YES, YES. >> WHAT ARE WE ALSO TALKING ABOUT THE REMOVAL OF THE CROSSWALK? >> NO CROSSWALK WAS SAYING NO. >> WE CAN MAKE SUBTLE ENHANCEMENTS. WE INTEND TO MAKE SUBTLE ENHANCEMENTS AT A CROSS TRAFFIC THE CROSSWALK AT ROCKLEDGE ROAD WHERE THE NEW ONE IS GOING TO GO CURRENTLY HAS YOU KNOW, THE YELLOW FIGURES. >> ALL THAT STAYS THAT STAYS. YES, WELL THAT'S CORRECT. BUT IT WILL ALL BE IMPROVED WHEN THE PROJECT COMES IN IN ITS TOTALITY BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE A NEW SIGNAL. >> OKAY. YES, GOOD. THAT'S FINE. YEAH. YEAH. VERY GOOD QUESTION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANKS ALL THANKS. THANK YOU. EXCEPT THE NEXT REVIEW OF ICE RESOLUTION SO I KNOW WE'VE TAKEN OUR TIME WITH THIS BUT [01:05:08] THANK YOU FOR BRINGING IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IT HASN'T BEEN AN ELECTION SO RIGHT BUT IT MIGHT BE APPLICABLE. YES. SO I DID SOME ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ABOUT BUFFER ZONES AND HOW MANY FEET IS CONSIDERED UM, YOU KNOW, PRACTICAL OR SIMPLY SOMETHING THAT ANYONE WOULD WANT TO IMPLEMENT OR ANY YOU KNOW, GOVERNMENT ENTITY WOULD WANT TO IMPLEMENT. THE LARGEST I COULD FIND WAS IN CONNECTICUT THEY'RE LOOKING AT 250FT. SO I BASED THIS ON ON THAT TO YOU KNOW WE COULD THINK OF YOU KNOW 5000FT 10,000FT YOU KNOW WHATEVER WE COULD DO PIE IN THE SKY BUT I DON'T SEE THE POINT OF REALLY DOING THAT IF IT'S NOT GOING TO GET PASSED. I ALSO DID SOME RESEARCH WITH THE BRENNAN CENTER AND THEY HAD A LOT OF INFORMATION ABOUT HOW GOVERNMENT FEDERAL TROOPS OR ANY ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT IS ALLOWED OR NOT ALLOWED AT SOME POLLING SITES. SO I ADDED THAT IN JUST TO MAKE IT YOU KNOW, HAVE THE LEGAL INFORMATION YOU KNOW REFERENCE RIGHT IN THERE LIKE IT COULD AND THEN WE JUST ADJUSTED THE ENTITIES THAT WE INCLUDED TO BE THE US GOVERNMENT, THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER THAT WE ARE PETITIONING THEM TO TAKE THESE STEPS BECAUSE IT'S ON EVERY LEVEL. SO THAT'S WHAT THIS NEW VERSION IS. >> I JUST HAVE ONE SUGGESTION UM, YOU KNOW I THINK THE 250FT UM IT IS NOT GOING TO UM ENCOURAGE PEOPLE WHO ARE IMMIGRANTS OR LOOK LIKE IMMIGRANTS. I THINK IT'S STILL NOT ENOUGH AND I'M WONDERING IF WE BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU SAID THE STATE LEGISLATURE IS NOT GOING TO PASS IT. WHAT IF WE SAID EXTEND THE PROHIBITION ON ELECTIONEERING ACTIVITY ACTIVITIES TO WITHIN 250FT OF A SPECIFIED VOTING LOCATION? HOWEVER, MEMBERS OF THE TOWN BOARD WOULD PREFER IF AT ALL PART YOU KNOW, SAY SOMETHING IF AT ALL POSSIBLE THAT THE MINIMUM OF 1000FT OR 2000FT BECAUSE THAT WOULD IF WE COULD FIRST OF ALL, YOU KNOW, I THINK EVERYBODY IN THE LEGISLATURE PROBABLY WOULD LIKE TO DO MORE TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO VOTE. AND YOU KNOW, IF I WAS LIKE SOMEBODY THAT I WAS WORRIED ABOUT ON ICE, I WAS 250FT. I WOULD BE NERVOUS AND I PROBABLY WOULDN'T YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO DO ENOUGH TO UH TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO VOTE. I THINK IF IT WAS LIKE 1000FT OR ORIGINALLY 2000FT WHICH IS WHAT YOU ORIGINALLY RECOMMENDED ,I THINK THAT WAS MUCH BETTER. AND AGAIN WHAT WE HAVE TO DO IS IT LIKE SENTENCING TOWN BOARD WOULD PREFER I MEAN THIS RESOLUTION IS NOT A LOCAL LAW SO A RESOLUTION IS JUST A SENSE OF TO OUR STATE LEGISLATORS THAT THEY COULD TRY A LITTLE HARDER TO INCREASE THE UH THE UM THE PROHIBITION. >> SO ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT WE SAY A MINIMUM OF 250FT IN A MAXIMUM OF A THOUSAND? >> IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? OR WE COULD SAY WE WOULD PREFER WE COULD SAY DO THEY REALLY CARE WHAT WE PREFER? I MEAN, THIS RESOLUTION DOESN'T HAVE THAT. IT'S BASICALLY JUST A RESOLUTION SAYING THIS IS OUR OUR FEELING SO I WOULD PREFER UM, YOU KNOW, JUST ADDING ANOTHER YOU KNOW, ANOTHER SENTENCE SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD PREFER THAT THE LEGISLATURE IF THEY'RE GOING TO ADOPT A LAW UM EXPAND IT TO WITHIN 1000FT OR 2000FT I WOULD THINK THAT WOULD BE MORE MEANINGFUL AND I WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE MORE OF AN EFFECT. >> AND I THINK THAT IF THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT OTHER MUNICIPALITIES THOUGHT WAS, YOU KNOW, PRUDENT TO SUGGEST AND THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SO BECAUSE NO OTHER WELL, I DID A LOT OF RESEARCH AND NO ONE ELSE IS SUGGESTING NO OTHER LEGISLATION SUGGESTING THAT LEVEL OF BUFFER THE ISSUE MIGHT BE LEADING ON TO OTHER PROPERTIES NEARBY. SO FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAVE A BUILDING ACROSS THE STREET YET OF HOMELAND SECURITY IS STILL IN THERE. >> I DON'T BELIEVE THEY ARE BUT IF IF THERE IS A VALID LEGAL POLICE ISSUE OCCURRING OVER THERE, YOU DON'T WANT TO PASS SOMETHING THAT'S PREVENTING THAT SUPPOSED TO PREVENT THAT IT WOULDN'T MAKE LOGICAL SORT OF OVERLAP OF DIFFERENT RIGHT I ON THE OTHER HAND IF WE PASSED A RESOLUTION SAYING 1000FT THE STATE LEGISLATURE YOU'RE ALWAYS WELL FIRST OF ALL THE STATE LEGISLATURE IS GOING TO SAY OH [01:10:01] GREENBURG NOW IS DOING WHAT ARDSLEY DID. YOU KNOW THE OTHER RIVER VILLAGES ARE DOING AND WE'RE GLAD THAT THEY TOWNS SO THEY THEY DIDN'T YOU KNOW THEY DIDN'T PUT A BUFFER ZONE BUT I'M I'M WELL I'M SUGGESTING IS THAT WE MAKE THE LAW PROPOSE LAW BETTER YOU KNOW THE BOARD DOESN'T WANT TO DO IT WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO IT BUT I JUST THINK THAT THE GOAL IS IS NOT THE RESOLUTION. THE GOAL IS ENCOURAGING PEOPLE TO VOTE. UM AND NOT TO BE AFRAID OF ICE AND AND TO ME IF WE COULD GET SOMETHING STRONGER THAT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO IT WELL I DON'T SEE HOW THAT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENT IMPRESSION ON YOU TALKING ABOUT ON RESIDENTS ACTUALLY BEING AFRAID TO COME OUT AND VOTE. >> I THINK PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE AFRAID TO COME OUT TO VOTE BECAUSE YOU KNOW, THEY'RE AFRAID THAT ICE IS SO OUR RESOLUTION WHETHER IT'S 250FT OR 5000FT IS NOT GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PROTECTION AND WHAT'S LEGAL. >> I MEAN 250 RIGHT? >> THIS IS WELL, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO IS YOU LOOK I WOULD LIKE TO DO MORE BUT I DON'T REALLY SEE THE POINT AND I RATHER GET IT PASSED JUDGE TAKING THE LEAD ON THIS AND SHE'S DONE THE RESEARCH AND I THINK WE SHOULD BE SUPPORTING IT. SO THAT'S I JUST CAME UP WITH A FRIENDLY RESOLUTION FOR OKAY SO IT'S GOING TO GO ON OUR NEXT TOWN BOARD MEETING AND MAKE THIS CHANGE FROM CITIZENS TO RESIDENTS AS WAS SUGGESTED. THANK YOU. JUST TO INCREASE THE MARGIN SO THERE'S A PLACE TO STEP IT. YES. THINK IT WAS TEN. THANK YOU, JOY. IT'S THE MARGINS 1.8. YES. WELL, ARE WE READY FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION AND THIS I'M SURE SUPERVISOR WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE'RE GOING TO EXECUTIVE SESSION UH, FOR THE PURPOSES OF UM DISCUSSING PERSONAL MATTERS INVOLVING CIVIC INDIVIDUALS AND TO SEEK LEGAL ADVICE ON VARIOUS MATTERS. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.